From: Charles L. <cl...@gm...> - 2006-03-31 07:57:24
|
On 3/29/06, Rick Mann <rm...@la...> wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2006, at 7:21 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > > > The test that failed is part of the C++ API which > > has not been part of the core distribution for as long as the C API. > > So, which of the other failing tests are part of the C++ API? $ ls *.c testlibusb.c $ ls *.cpp descriptor_test.cpp driver_name.cpp find_hubs.cpp =20 find_mice.cpp get_resolution.cpp hub_strings.cpp =20 id_test.cpp As Johannes alluded to earlier, the tests have some hardcoded assumptions. The way I see it, you would use the tests during development of libusb itself - you can run it on a stock version of the library, and then run it again later to see if you introduced any regressions. If you are just trying to use the library, the tests are probably less useful. As a point of reference, I have been inermittently using a libusb-based SANE backend on 10.4.5 for the past several weeks with no problems. -- - Charles Lepple |