|
From: Tim R. <ti...@pr...> - 2016-07-12 18:39:38
|
Kustaa Nyholm wrote: > On 12/07/2016 11:52, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgu...@bi...> wrote: >> seem to have invented a new doctrine for yourself, where distribution >> somehow doesn't fall into the scope of copyright. If you set this as an >> axiom, I'm sure you can make all sorts of interesting legal conclusions >> follow, but the rest of the world does not work that way. :-) > Well, me and the layers I've talked to will then have to disagree with > you and the rest of the world. > > Selling/distributing physical goods (like a computer) does not constitute > copying in our books and copyright does not apply. Licensing and copyrighting are not the same thing. When you download and install Qt, you are required to agree to a license agreement. That agreement limits your activities to a much greater degree than simple copyright. -- Tim Roberts, ti...@pr... Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. |