From: Pete B. <pb...@gm...> - 2011-03-03 15:39:00
|
On 2011.03.03 14:45, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > Personally I do not think it is really important to support Win2k. > If there is a vote on whether to support for Win2k or old compilers > like VC6, I will vote for NO. However, the other Windows > developers seem to like to support Win2k and VC6. I'd say it all depends on the implementation/maintenance cost. From Graeme's previous endeavour, and from the upcoming libusbK.sys being win2k compatible, as libusb0.sys, implementing win2k support shouldn't be too costly in time. If it can help our users, we might as well go for it. But we might adopt the YMMV approach of MinGW-w64, so that we can avoid (ideally) testing each release on Win2k, to see if the latest changes break anything. Not a priority right now, but something we can look into when we have nothing better to do. Regards, /Pete |