From: Xiaofan C. <xia...@gm...> - 2011-02-24 07:50:10
|
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Xiaofan Chen <xia...@gm...> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Peter Stuge <pe...@st...> wrote: >> Pete Batard wrote: >>> it looks to me like we should be able to work with an extended >>> version of the WinUSB API to provide the unconstrained >>> functionality required for libusb-1.0. >> >> Great if true! Important for me that no DLL is required besides >> libusb-1.0.dll, regardless of which kernel driver is used, but I >> think this is also what is intended. >> > > I am not sure what you mean here. For the WinUSB backend, > then you need the winusb.dll. For the new libusbK backend, > you will need the libusbk.dll. > On the other hand, I do not think this is an issue. For the winusb.dll, it is either already in the system or it will be installed by the driver installation process. For the libusbk.dll, it will be installed together with the driver (along with libusb0.dll). Actually we can choose to include libusb-1.0.dll in the driver installation as well. The driver installation will take care of the 32bit/64bit issue. For the 64bit system, both 32bit and 64bit dll will be installed. -- Xiaofan |