From: Pete B. <pb...@gm...> - 2010-08-19 14:41:31
|
On 2010.08.19 14:50, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Michael Plante > <mic...@gm...> wrote: >> Xiaofan Chen wrote: >>>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Pete Batard<pb...@gm...> wrote: >>>>> Yup. But then again, everybody should know that, on a 64 bit system, >>>>> only 64 bit DLLs go in system32, and that 32 bit ones go into SysWOW64. >>>>> How could anyone miss that? >>>> >>>> People just start to use 64bit Windows? You are probably a bit >>>> more optimistic whereas I am a bit more pessimistic in this point. :-) >> >> >> I took it as sarcasm. But maybe a smiley would've helped. > > Hmm, sorry but I have put a smiley there. I am not so sure > what you mean here. I was answering Pete's question. Sorry about that. My remark about 32 into 64 and 64 into 32 being obvious was sarcasm. Should have put a smiley. Still very much puzzled about what was so impossible with using System64 for 64 bit DLLs, especially as System32 came from keeping system for 16 bit and placing 32 bit DLLs elsewhere... Regards, /Pete |