Re: [Libusb-devel] libusb-1.0.9 soon?

[Michael P. <mic...@gm...>]

Peter Stuge wrote:
>> Pete Batard wrote:
>> > I have no objection with leaving the current Windows commits as
>> > they are (even if there are still additional matters to sort out),
>> > and do a 1.0.9 release that has only MinGW and cygwin Windows
>> > support.
>>
>> Which commits would need to be applied for this?

Minimum, I see:

1) a number of residuals between poll_windows.[ch], windows_usb.[ch] in
Pete's and Daniel's tree.  Maybe an old patch was applied?

2) calling convention (stdcall or WINAPI)

While there are other things that may be nice (certain "error" return codes,
and some additional residuals), these seem to be the only essential ones.  I
can push a windows_merge4 branch that shows my residuals, but there are
potential issues with some of my commits, so I would not suggest taking them
as-is, which is part of why I've just held onto it.

Michael