Re: [Libusb-devel] usbfs: usb_submit_urb returned -121

[Daniel D. <da...@re...>]

El 24/07/10 11:35, Peter Stuge escribió:
> Hi,
>
> Daniel Drake wrote:
>>> This patch instead changes the code path directly after
>>> submission, and if errno == EREMOTEIO then the reap code is
>>> instructed that all is well via reap_action = COMPLETED_EARLY.
> ..
>>> While my guess is that the former patch would work for Ludovic this
>>> one is much more correct. Please test it!
>>
>> This patch would probably work OK but it isn't quite correct. If the 3rd
>> URB fails with EREMOTEIO, the code immediately below your patch will try
>> and cancel URBs 1 and 2. That's probably harmless, but it would be
>> logical and simple to avoid that.
>
> Thanks for spotting that! I've updated the patch and described what
> is going on in the comments too.

excellent, applied thanks!