|
From: Michael P. <mic...@gm...> - 2010-01-12 19:11:48
|
Pete wrote: >> > Note that I have not yet >> > sent a fix for LOOP_CONTINUE...still looking for feedback on your preference >> > there. >> >> What does the LOOP_CONTINUE patch look like? I guess I'll decide if I >> want to remove LOOP_CONTINUE depending on the complexity of this patch, >> or if I get the vibe that the code would be better off without >> LOOP_CONTINUE. >> >> Replacing all the LOOP_CONTINUE's is a 1 minute operation anyway, so no >> big deal. Attached. Whatever you prefer. Thanks, Michael |