Re: [Libusb-devel] Missing Reports

[Frank T. <fr...@fr...>]

> In fact, it's not clear why you wanted to use a timeout in the first 
> place.  Did you have some reason to think that something must be going 
> wrong if you didn't receive any data within X ms?

The use of the short timeout was just how the software evolved.  I was using 
libusb-0.1 originally, calling interrupt read in a tight loop, and checking to 
see if I had anything to write after the read timed out.  Now that I'm using 
libusb-1, I don't need to do that any more.

Thanks for the help,
Frank