You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(9) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(45) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(40) |
Nov
(39) |
Dec
(45) |
2005 |
Jan
(113) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(53) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(56) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(32) |
Nov
(47) |
Dec
(22) |
2006 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(37) |
Aug
(51) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(51) |
Dec
(20) |
2007 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(67) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(73) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(58) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(74) |
Dec
(9) |
2008 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(40) |
Jun
(32) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(34) |
Dec
(12) |
2009 |
Jan
(44) |
Feb
(33) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(109) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(37) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(7) |
2010 |
Jan
(36) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(35) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(42) |
Jun
(104) |
Jul
(135) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(129) |
Dec
(75) |
2011 |
Jan
(105) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(93) |
Apr
(166) |
May
(169) |
Jun
(188) |
Jul
(106) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(85) |
Oct
(46) |
Nov
(102) |
Dec
(105) |
2012 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(115) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(93) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(77) |
Jul
(88) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(72) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(70) |
2013 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(85) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(48) |
May
(40) |
Jun
(49) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(66) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(28) |
Dec
(16) |
2014 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(58) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(10) |
2015 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
|
Nov
(15) |
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(16) |
May
|
Jun
(15) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(5) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2023 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
From: Roger B. <ro...@ro...> - 2003-11-26 01:20:03
|
Just to let you know that I managed to wrap the library using Swig. My program is actually written in Python. I am writing a small amount of Python code to make it all object oriented. The only real problem is this declaration near the end of the file: struct usb_device *usb_device(usb_dev_handle *dev); SWIG can't handle the same symbol being both a structure name and a function name. I would recommend adding another differently named function. Memory management also isn't too clear. Is all memory invalidated when usb_find_busses/devices is called? Or is new memory allocated and that old stuff leaked? I basically just need to hook the right semantics into my code. Roger |
From: Roger B. <ro...@ro...> - 2003-11-26 01:14:12
|
Why does the libusb skip devices? The attached screenshot is part of what device manager shows me. You can see two cellphones, a USB to serial cable and a scanner. libusb only shows me two hubs and the two cellphones. I suspect that is because it skips devices, but doesn't say why. LIBUSB_DLL: usb_os_init: dll version: 0.1.7.8 LIBUSB_DLL: usb_os_init: installed driver version: 11/20/2003, 0.1.7.8 LIBUSB_DLL: usb_os_init: running driver version: 0.1.7.8 LIBUSB_DLL: usb_os_find_busses: found bus-0 LIBUSB_DLL: usb_os_find_devices: skipping 6 devices LIBUSB_DLL: usb_os_find_devices: found \\.\libusb0-0006--0451-1446 on bus-0 LIBUSB_DLL: usb_os_find_devices: found \\.\libusb0-0007--0451-2046 on bus-0 LIBUSB_DLL: usb_os_find_devices: found \\.\libusb0-0008--1004-6000 on bus-0 LIBUSB_DLL: usb_os_find_devices: found \\.\libusb0-0009--1004-6000 on bus-0 skipped 4 class/vendor specific interface descriptors skipped 4 class/vendor specific interface descriptors skipped 1 class/vendor specific interface descriptors Roger |
From: JD C. <li...@tr...> - 2003-11-25 01:12:02
|
FYI, I've been using it for my cross platform work for a little while now, with now apparent problems. JD nick wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently looking into cross-platform user-mode usb libraries to > help me write an application for both MacOSX and WinXP.. I couldn't > find archives for this list, so - what's the current status of > libusb-win32? Is it kept in sync with the main project? > > Given that my application will have to have a GUI under windows, I > guess I will need to use VC++, does this rule out the use of > libusb-win32? > > Cheers, > Nick > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Libusb-win32-devel mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusb-win32-devel |
From: Stephan M. <ste...@we...> - 2003-11-24 17:41:16
|
nick <nic...@ya...> schrieb am 24.11.03 13:21:10: > > Hi, > > I'm currently looking into cross-platform user-mode usb libraries to > help me write an application for both MacOSX and WinXP.. I couldn't > find archives for this list, so - what's the current status of > libusb-win32? Is it kept in sync with the main project? Libusb-win32 is currently under active development, still in beta stage, and not as mature as the main project. The project will be kept in sync with the main project as close as possible to ensure full API und functional compatibility. > > Given that my application will have to have a GUI under windows, I > guess I will need to use VC++, does this rule out the use of > libusb-win32? No, you can use the library with VC++, although the library is build with the GNU C compiler. The binary distribution package provides import libraries for all major compilers (GCC, BCC, and VC++) to make the usage easier. But you won't be able to build the DLL itself using VC++ because VC++ isn't fully C99 compatible (I have only tested version 6 so far, maybe the latest version is better). > > Cheers, > Nick > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Libusb-win32-devel mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusb-win32-devel ______________________________________________________________________________ WEB.DE FreeMail wird 5 Jahre jung! Feiern Sie mit uns und nutzen Sie die neuen Funktionen http://f.web.de/features/?mc=021130 |
From: nick <nic...@ya...> - 2003-11-24 12:20:45
|
Hi, I'm currently looking into cross-platform user-mode usb libraries to help me write an application for both MacOSX and WinXP.. I couldn't find archives for this list, so - what's the current status of libusb-win32? Is it kept in sync with the main project? Given that my application will have to have a GUI under windows, I guess I will need to use VC++, does this rule out the use of libusb-win32? Cheers, Nick |
From: Stephan M. <Ste...@ia...> - 2003-10-22 07:01:28
|
Hi Dag, To uninstall libusb-win32 do the following: a) uninstalling the filter driver: - start 'regedit.exe' on XP and W98 systems, on W2K systems use 'regedt32.exe' - make sure that you have the required rights to modify the registry - on NT-style systems delete the key 'LowerFilters' under the path 'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{36FC9E60-C465-11CF-8056-444553540000}' (it should currently be set to 'libusbfl') - on W98 systems this key is located at 'System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Class\USB' - reboot the system b) uninstalling the stub driver (if used): - go to the control panel - open the device manger - remove your device entry After that you can remove the driver and inf files from your system by just deleting them. BTW, I just released version 0.1.7.6 which fixes some stupid bugs. You should use this version in the future. Regards Stephan |
From: Dag B. <da...@br...> - 2003-10-21 19:08:03
|
Hi, What is the correct procedure to uninstall libusb-win32? I tried version 0.1.7.5 a couple of days ago, and my laptop wasn't to happy about it. It constantly burned 20% CPU and hanged when trying to shut down the machine. I would like to remove it from my laptop and try the new version on a more suitable development machine. -- Dag |
From: JD C. <li...@tr...> - 2003-10-15 02:23:41
|
Thanks for the help Stephan! I was just a bit confused on my installation order. At first I thought that my application constituted the USB driver you spoke of. (It sounded like the stub driver didn't need to be installed.) But I'm happy to say that it worked once I installed stub driver after changing the device and product ID's. Thanks again for the work, it going to be very useful. JD Stephan Meyer wrote: > "J.D. Cole" <jd...@tr...> schrieb am 09.10.03 12:52:15: > > >> Howdy, >> I've been trying to get your drivers each of my machines, XP and 2k, >> to no avail. I'm just trying to use the binaries provided, but I'm >> wondering: do I still need the DDK to install from the bin's? >> > > > No the DDK is not required for just using the library/drivers. > > > >> I'll be happy to give any feedback and will definitely be trying >> fixes out ASAP. I basically followed the directions from the readme >> verbatim, minus the part about compiling. >> >> 1. As administrator (and this goes for both machines) I right clicked >> and installed the libusbfl.inf, no complaints from the box. >> 2. Rebooted and logged on as a normal user. >> 3. Ran testlibusb, it gave the initial header, i.e. device desc, >> product num, etc., but showed no devices. (For the record I had tried >> this process with a number of different devices, including my mouse.) >> > > > What do you mean by "showed no devices"? It normaly only prints the > descriptors > it retrieved from the available devices. If it does this, the filter > driver works. > > > >> 4.a. Win2k misbehaved the most when I plugged in a device which I'm >> developing. It wouldn't open the device manager anymore and took >> long, if not forever, to reboot or shutdown. >> > > > > >> 4.b. XP was a little more gentle, it displayed my device with the >> official "?" on the Dev. manager. I even tried installing the driver >> via the manager....no luck. >> > > > Which driver did you install for this device? It should be the stub > driver with > a modified inf-file as described in the README. > > Have you tried DebugView from www.sysinternals.com to capture the > drivers debug messages > (needs the *-checked-* versions of the drivers to be installed). Maybe > you could post > some log message here. > |
From: Stephan M. <ste...@we...> - 2003-10-09 11:40:58
|
"J.D. Cole" <jd...@tr...> schrieb am 09.10.03 12:52:15: > > Howdy, > I've been trying to get your drivers each of my machines, XP and 2k, > to no avail. I'm just trying to use the binaries provided, but I'm > wondering: do I still need the DDK to install from the bin's? No the DDK is not required for just using the library/drivers. > > I'll be happy to give any feedback and will definitely be trying fixes > out ASAP. I basically followed the directions from the readme verbatim, > minus the part about compiling. > > 1. As administrator (and this goes for both machines) I right clicked > and installed the libusbfl.inf, no complaints from the box. > 2. Rebooted and logged on as a normal user. > 3. Ran testlibusb, it gave the initial header, i.e. device desc, product > num, etc., but showed no devices. (For the record I had tried this > process with a number of different devices, including my mouse.) What do you mean by "showed no devices"? It normaly only prints the descriptors it retrieved from the available devices. If it does this, the filter driver works. > 4.a. Win2k misbehaved the most when I plugged in a device which I'm > developing. It wouldn't open the device manager anymore and took long, > if not forever, to reboot or shutdown. > 4.b. XP was a little more gentle, it displayed my device with the > official "?" on the Dev. manager. I even tried installing the driver via > the manager....no luck. Which driver did you install for this device? It should be the stub driver with a modified inf-file as described in the README. Have you tried DebugView from www.sysinternals.com to capture the drivers debug messages (needs the *-checked-* versions of the drivers to be installed). Maybe you could post some log message here. > > I am stoked that you've done the work on this thing, though, and hope I > can help get this thing into gear. > > JD > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > _______________________________________________ > Libusb-win32-devel mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusb-win32-devel ______________________________________________________________________________ Zwei Mal Platz 1 mit dem jeweils besten Testergebnis! WEB.DE FreeMail und WEB.DE Club bei Stiftung Warentest! http://f.web.de/?mc=021183 |
From: J.D. C. <jd...@tr...> - 2003-10-09 10:48:30
|
Howdy, I've been trying to get your drivers each of my machines, XP and 2k, to no avail. I'm just trying to use the binaries provided, but I'm wondering: do I still need the DDK to install from the bin's? I'll be happy to give any feedback and will definitely be trying fixes out ASAP. I basically followed the directions from the readme verbatim, minus the part about compiling. 1. As administrator (and this goes for both machines) I right clicked and installed the libusbfl.inf, no complaints from the box. 2. Rebooted and logged on as a normal user. 3. Ran testlibusb, it gave the initial header, i.e. device desc, product num, etc., but showed no devices. (For the record I had tried this process with a number of different devices, including my mouse.) 4.a. Win2k misbehaved the most when I plugged in a device which I'm developing. It wouldn't open the device manager anymore and took long, if not forever, to reboot or shutdown. 4.b. XP was a little more gentle, it displayed my device with the official "?" on the Dev. manager. I even tried installing the driver via the manager....no luck. I am stoked that you've done the work on this thing, though, and hope I can help get this thing into gear. JD |