Re: [librsync-devel] Fix for rsync.h

[Donovan B. <ab...@mi...>]

On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 11:51, Martin Pool wrote:
> Rather than making the whole file autogenerated, I think it would
> would be better to follow gtk and openssl in having a separate
> librsync-config.h file which is generated from a .in file and included
> by the main header.  It seems a little easier to keep the
> autogenerated stuff separate from the parts that people will generally
> want to look at or change.

Does this librsync-config.h replace the existing config.h? And rsync.h
(now librsync.h) includes librsync-config.h? How does this impact on
other projects that have their own config.h and include librsync.h?
Don't you get similar sorts of problems?

> I think I'd like to rename the file to librsync.h too, to reflect it
> being separate from rsync proper.

Sounds good to me.

-- 
Donovan Baarda <ab...@mi...>
http://minkirri.apana.org.au/~abo/