Re: [libposix-development] printf parser

[Henrique A. <hd...@gm...>]

 Added sprintf for those who needed it.

2009/7/1 Henrique Almeida <hd...@gm...>:
>  Some integer and string outputs are working. The output of
> printf_parser should be:
>
> 511abcd abcdxyz
> e 4095 f  g 0X2D i
>
>  Please test.
>
> 2009/6/29 Henrique Almeida <hd...@gm...>:
>>  It could be used in the short term, but alloca is not present in the
>> standard. According to glibc docs, it's a BSD extension.
>>
>> 2009/6/28 Chris Forbes <ch...@fa...>:
>>> Henrique:
>>>
>>>> require a working malloc implementation
>>>
>>> I assume you'd be able to allocate that stuff locally in your own stack
>>> frame with alloca(), in lieu of having a real allocator?
>>>
>>> -- Chris
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Henrique Almeida [mailto:hd...@gm...]
>>> Sent: Monday, 29 June 2009 12:14 p.m.
>>> To: lib...@li...
>>> Subject: Re: [libposix-development] printf parser
>>>
>>>  We have to make them too. Lots of them. While printf is not ready,
>>> the two programs cited are unit tests for the parser and scanner. I've
>>> put them in the "tests/internal" directory since they are
>>> implementation details. Also we're missing support for tests in our
>>> CMakeLists.txt (ie "make test"). After that the CMake build will be
>>> complete.
>>>
>>> 2009/6/28 Kirill A. Shutemov <ki...@sh...>:
>>>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Henrique Almeida<hd...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>  I'm approaching a complete printf implementation, and I've just
>>>>> updated a printf parser to the repository, which is already in an
>>>>> advanced state. It's able to parse non trivial strings, like "e %-2ld
>>>>> f %0#'133.45Lg g %+.hhX i\n". The actual output functions
>>>>> (output_unsigned, output_double, etc.) are still missing, so it
>>>>> doesn't print anything yet, but I'll start writing those soon. Also
>>>>> missing are dealing with "numbered arguments" (things like "%2$d %1$s
>>>>> %3$g", they allow out of order argument passing), which are harder and
>>>>> require a working malloc implementation.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Please run the tests "printf_parser" and "printf_scanner" and check
>>>>> that they don't crash or give weird results. printf_scanner should
>>>>> return zero and printf_parser should have the following result at the
>>>>> moment:
>>>>>
>>>>> abcd
>>>>> e  f  g  i
>>>>>
>>>>>  I expect to finish this until the middle of the week, so that we have
>>>>> a nearly complete printf.
>>>>
>>>> What about unit tests?
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Libposix-development mailing list
>>>> Lib...@li...
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libposix-development
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>  Henrique Dante de Almeida
>>>  hd...@gm...
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Libposix-development mailing list
>>> Lib...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libposix-development
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Libposix-development mailing list
>>> Lib...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libposix-development
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>  Henrique Dante de Almeida
>>  hd...@gm...
>>
>
>
>
> --
>  Henrique Dante de Almeida
>  hd...@gm...
>



-- 
 Henrique Dante de Almeida
 hd...@gm...