|
From: Ralf V. <ral...@we...> - 2013-08-12 20:34:18
|
Hello, in libpki I found only some files where the GPL license is noticed. The according spec-file contains a hint for a BSD-Style license. So a general licence file would be preferable. In general I prefer a Apache-like / BSD-Style license. Than also commercial third parties can use the library without releasing their proprietary parts and can feel free if they distribute their patches to the community. I think this promotes the distribution of the library. I think this is also the reason why openssl is so successful in commercial and non-commercial areas. Regards, Ralf Am 07.08.2013 00:14, schrieb Dr. Pala: > Hi all, > > I wanted to ask you a question about the current license of LibPKI. It > was asked to change it from GPL to Apache-like (exactly as all the other > licenses of our projects). What do you think ? Good idea or bad ? > > Cheers, > Max > > > -- > > Best Regards, > Massimiliano Pala, Ph.D. > OpenCA Labs Director > > OpenCA Labs > Tel. (603) 369-9332 > skype: openca > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! > It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. > Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. > Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > > > _______________________________________________ > Libpki-users mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libpki-users > |