You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2004 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
2005 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(44) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(17) |
2006 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(7) |
2007 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(7) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(9) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Perry S. <pe...@ea...> - 2008-01-21 03:07:23
|
Again, I am not sure if this is new news. This sucks down the list of Banks, etc from the Quicken 2007 site. This fails sometimes. I don't know why. This all seems way too mysterious and flakey to me at this point. Enjoy, Perry |
From: Perry S. <pe...@ea...> - 2008-01-21 01:42:46
|
This patch (attached) is working for me. (You need to change the 2005 to 2007 as well as VER from 6 to 9.) HTH Perry |
From: <rg...@sb...> - 2008-01-16 05:15:05
|
I need to correct my statement about the "VER" "fix" -- it was changed from VER=6 to VER=9 in kmymoney. This change was in one file only in kmymoney, and after some 'grep'-ing in libofx it looked like it was in one file as well, so changed it, but did not get results as in kmymoney. How to get the ofx server url ? There are many tricks, including the ones you mentioned. The last one I used looked the "cleanest": curl "http://moneycentral.msn.com/money/2005/mnynet/service/olsvcupd/OnlSvcBrandInfo.aspx?MSNGUID=&GUID=%1&SKU=3&VER=9" where "%1" must be replaced with your fipid this will return all the relevant info (including the url) of that provider. (I got that link form the libofx code while dealing with the VER changes) rg On Tuesday 15 January 2008 06:16, Lance Robinson wrote: > The website that you're referring to is that of Jeremy Jongsma. You can > also find the data that Jeremy has packaged there posted in the OFX Blog: > http://ofxblog.wordpress.com/. It uses ver = 6, though. From what I > understand, the OFX Blog is soon to update for ver = 9. > > Lance > http://geekswithblogs.net/Lance > > On Jan 15, 2008 9:11 AM, Perry Smith <pe...@ea...> wrote: > > (Top posting to be consistent -- I know that really upsets some folks.) > > > > This may help a tiny bit. It may not be new news. > > I was going to ask "How do I get the URL's" but then I remembered this > > script that I played with a while back: > > > > getfidata.sh.gz <http://www.jongsma.org/gc/bankinfo/getfidata.sh.gz> > > > > The web site is here: http://www.jongsma.org/gc. It has a few pointers > > to things that might be useful. > > > > So I downloaded the script and ran it. But, all the Provider URL's are > > the stupid cust404 paths. > > > > So, I took the idea below and reversed it. Starting with the script > > above, replace 2006 with 2007 in the URLs and also replace VER=6 to VER=9 > > (A wild shot in the dark) > > > > On the two files I checked, the URL is valid (well, its not the bogus > > cust404 URL). > > > > I don't know exactly what this means as far as libofx but as far as the > > community, at least there is one way (for now) to get the URLs > > > > HTH, > > Perry Smith ( pe...@ea... ) > > Ease Software, Inc. ( http://www.easesoftware.com ) > > > > Low cost SATA Disk Systems for IBMs p5, pSeries, and RS/6000 AIX systems > > > > > > On Jan 15, 2008, at 1:30 AM, rg...@sb... wrote: > > > > I've struggle with the same problem but I got it working by using the > > --url option to specify the bank's ofx server directly. > > > > Someone described the 404.htm problem on the kmymoney list. > > Thomas, the lead developer, figured out some problem with the > > msn/provider differences which he fixed by changing a parameter (VER=9 > > to 6) in the code. > > I followed that fix through and applied it to the ofx code, but it did > > not > > > > work, aka still getting the 404 page from msn. (note that Thomas' fix did > > resolve the issue in kmymoney). > > > > This experimentation was done about 2 weeks ago. > > > > rg > > > > On Sunday 13 January 2008 17:10, Perry Smith wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I searched and can not find any hits. > > > > > > I have libofx 0.9 on a Mac 10.5. I installed it myself. I have libxml > > > > ++ version 1.0.5. I could not tell which version to use. > > > > > > I can get ofxconnect to get me the list of banks (-b) and the FID (-f) > > > > and the services it does (-v) but when I try to get the accounts with - > > > > a I get back: > > > > > > ofxconnect -a --fipid=7392 --user=pXXXXXXn --pass=oXXXXXXy accounts.ofx > > > > file accounts.ofx > > > > fipid 7392 > > > > contacting partner server... > > > > fid 6812 > > > > org HAN > > > > url http://moneycentral.msn.com/cust404.htm > > > > user pXXXXXXn > > > > pass oXXXXXXy > > > > > > The command above is with Bank Of America (not CA, ...). I also tried > > > > other BoA FID's. And I have an account with Chase that I tried. > > > > Chase use to be Bank One so I tried that too. I always get back > > > > (rougly speaking) the above reply. And, accounts.ofx is actually an > > > > html page for a page not found. Both of these accounts I can use via > > > > their on line banking and the chase account I can use via Quicken. > > > > So, I'm pretty sure the account and passwords are correct. > > > > > > Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong or how to debug this. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > Perry Smith > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > > > > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > > > > just about anything Open Source. > > > > > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketpl > >ac > > > > e _______________________________________________ > > > > Libofx-devel mailing list > > > > Lib...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libofx-devel > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > > just about anything Open Source. > > > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketpl > >ace _______________________________________________ > > Libofx-devel mailing list > > Lib...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libofx-devel > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > > just about anything Open Source. > > > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketpl > >ace _______________________________________________ > > Libofx-devel mailing list > > Lib...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libofx-devel |
From: Lance R. <lmr...@gm...> - 2008-01-15 14:16:38
|
The website that you're referring to is that of Jeremy Jongsma. You can also find the data that Jeremy has packaged there posted in the OFX Blog: http://ofxblog.wordpress.com/. It uses ver = 6, though. From what I understand, the OFX Blog is soon to update for ver = 9. Lance http://geekswithblogs.net/Lance On Jan 15, 2008 9:11 AM, Perry Smith <pe...@ea...> wrote: > (Top posting to be consistent -- I know that really upsets some folks.) > > This may help a tiny bit. It may not be new news. > I was going to ask "How do I get the URL's" but then I remembered this > script that I played with a while back: > > getfidata.sh.gz <http://www.jongsma.org/gc/bankinfo/getfidata.sh.gz> > > The web site is here: http://www.jongsma.org/gc. It has a few pointers to > things that might be useful. > > So I downloaded the script and ran it. But, all the Provider URL's are > the stupid cust404 paths. > > So, I took the idea below and reversed it. Starting with the script > above, replace 2006 with 2007 in the URLs and also replace VER=6 to VER=9 > (A wild shot in the dark) > > On the two files I checked, the URL is valid (well, its not the bogus > cust404 URL). > > I don't know exactly what this means as far as libofx but as far as the > community, at least there is one way (for now) to get the URLs > > HTH, > Perry Smith ( pe...@ea... ) > Ease Software, Inc. ( http://www.easesoftware.com ) > > Low cost SATA Disk Systems for IBMs p5, pSeries, and RS/6000 AIX systems > > > On Jan 15, 2008, at 1:30 AM, rg...@sb... wrote: > > I've struggle with the same problem but I got it working by using the > --url option to specify the bank's ofx server directly. > > Someone described the 404.htm problem on the kmymoney list. > Thomas, the lead developer, figured out some problem with the msn/provider > differences which he fixed by changing a parameter (VER=9 to 6) in the > code. > I followed that fix through and applied it to the ofx code, but it did not > > work, aka still getting the 404 page from msn. (note that Thomas' fix did > resolve the issue in kmymoney). > > This experimentation was done about 2 weeks ago. > > rg > > On Sunday 13 January 2008 17:10, Perry Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > > I searched and can not find any hits. > > > I have libofx 0.9 on a Mac 10.5. I installed it myself. I have libxml > > ++ version 1.0.5. I could not tell which version to use. > > > I can get ofxconnect to get me the list of banks (-b) and the FID (-f) > > and the services it does (-v) but when I try to get the accounts with - > > a I get back: > > > ofxconnect -a --fipid=7392 --user=pXXXXXXn --pass=oXXXXXXy accounts.ofx > > file accounts.ofx > > fipid 7392 > > contacting partner server... > > fid 6812 > > org HAN > > url http://moneycentral.msn.com/cust404.htm > > user pXXXXXXn > > pass oXXXXXXy > > > The command above is with Bank Of America (not CA, ...). I also tried > > other BoA FID's. And I have an account with Chase that I tried. > > Chase use to be Bank One so I tried that too. I always get back > > (rougly speaking) the above reply. And, accounts.ofx is actually an > > html page for a page not found. Both of these accounts I can use via > > their on line banking and the chase account I can use via Quicken. > > So, I'm pretty sure the account and passwords are correct. > > > Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong or how to debug this. > > > Thank you, > > Perry Smith > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > > just about anything Open Source. > > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplac > > e _______________________________________________ > > Libofx-devel mailing list > > Lib...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libofx-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > Libofx-devel mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libofx-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > Libofx-devel mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libofx-devel > > -- Lance http://geekswithblogs.net/Lance/ |
From: Perry S. <pe...@ea...> - 2008-01-15 14:11:34
|
(Top posting to be consistent -- I know that really upsets some folks.) This may help a tiny bit. It may not be new news. I was going to ask "How do I get the URL's" but then I remembered this script that I played with a while back: getfidata.sh.gz The web site is here: http://www.jongsma.org/gc. It has a few pointers to things that might be useful. So I downloaded the script and ran it. But, all the Provider URL's are the stupid cust404 paths. So, I took the idea below and reversed it. Starting with the script above, replace 2006 with 2007 in the URLs and also replace VER=6 to VER=9 (A wild shot in the dark) On the two files I checked, the URL is valid (well, its not the bogus cust404 URL). I don't know exactly what this means as far as libofx but as far as the community, at least there is one way (for now) to get the URLs HTH, Perry Smith ( pe...@ea... ) Ease Software, Inc. ( http://www.easesoftware.com ) Low cost SATA Disk Systems for IBMs p5, pSeries, and RS/6000 AIX systems On Jan 15, 2008, at 1:30 AM, rg...@sb... wrote: > I've struggle with the same problem but I got it working by using the > --url option to specify the bank's ofx server directly. > > Someone described the 404.htm problem on the kmymoney list. > Thomas, the lead developer, figured out some problem with the msn/ > provider > differences which he fixed by changing a parameter (VER=9 to 6) in > the code. > I followed that fix through and applied it to the ofx code, but it > did not > work, aka still getting the 404 page from msn. (note that Thomas' > fix did > resolve the issue in kmymoney). > > This experimentation was done about 2 weeks ago. > > rg > > On Sunday 13 January 2008 17:10, Perry Smith wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I searched and can not find any hits. >> >> I have libofx 0.9 on a Mac 10.5. I installed it myself. I have >> libxml >> ++ version 1.0.5. I could not tell which version to use. >> >> I can get ofxconnect to get me the list of banks (-b) and the FID (- >> f) >> and the services it does (-v) but when I try to get the accounts >> with - >> a I get back: >> >> ofxconnect -a --fipid=7392 --user=pXXXXXXn --pass=oXXXXXXy >> accounts.ofx >> file accounts.ofx >> fipid 7392 >> contacting partner server... >> fid 6812 >> org HAN >> url http://moneycentral.msn.com/cust404.htm >> user pXXXXXXn >> pass oXXXXXXy >> >> The command above is with Bank Of America (not CA, ...). I also >> tried >> other BoA FID's. And I have an account with Chase that I tried. >> Chase use to be Bank One so I tried that too. I always get back >> (rougly speaking) the above reply. And, accounts.ofx is actually an >> html page for a page not found. Both of these accounts I can use via >> their on line banking and the chase account I can use via Quicken. >> So, I'm pretty sure the account and passwords are correct. >> >> Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong or how to debug this. >> >> Thank you, >> Perry Smith >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. >> It's the best place to buy or sell services for >> just about anything Open Source. >> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplac >> e _______________________________________________ >> Libofx-devel mailing list >> Lib...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libofx-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > Libofx-devel mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libofx-devel > |
From: <rg...@sb...> - 2008-01-15 07:30:43
|
I've struggle with the same problem but I got it working by using the --url option to specify the bank's ofx server directly. Someone described the 404.htm problem on the kmymoney list. Thomas, the lead developer, figured out some problem with the msn/provider differences which he fixed by changing a parameter (VER=9 to 6) in the code. I followed that fix through and applied it to the ofx code, but it did not work, aka still getting the 404 page from msn. (note that Thomas' fix did resolve the issue in kmymoney). This experimentation was done about 2 weeks ago. rg On Sunday 13 January 2008 17:10, Perry Smith wrote: > Hi, > > I searched and can not find any hits. > > I have libofx 0.9 on a Mac 10.5. I installed it myself. I have libxml > ++ version 1.0.5. I could not tell which version to use. > > I can get ofxconnect to get me the list of banks (-b) and the FID (-f) > and the services it does (-v) but when I try to get the accounts with - > a I get back: > > ofxconnect -a --fipid=7392 --user=pXXXXXXn --pass=oXXXXXXy accounts.ofx > file accounts.ofx > fipid 7392 > contacting partner server... > fid 6812 > org HAN > url http://moneycentral.msn.com/cust404.htm > user pXXXXXXn > pass oXXXXXXy > > The command above is with Bank Of America (not CA, ...). I also tried > other BoA FID's. And I have an account with Chase that I tried. > Chase use to be Bank One so I tried that too. I always get back > (rougly speaking) the above reply. And, accounts.ofx is actually an > html page for a page not found. Both of these accounts I can use via > their on line banking and the chase account I can use via Quicken. > So, I'm pretty sure the account and passwords are correct. > > Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong or how to debug this. > > Thank you, > Perry Smith > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplac >e _______________________________________________ > Libofx-devel mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libofx-devel |
From: Perry S. <pe...@ea...> - 2008-01-14 01:10:31
|
Hi, I searched and can not find any hits. I have libofx 0.9 on a Mac 10.5. I installed it myself. I have libxml ++ version 1.0.5. I could not tell which version to use. I can get ofxconnect to get me the list of banks (-b) and the FID (-f) and the services it does (-v) but when I try to get the accounts with - a I get back: ofxconnect -a --fipid=7392 --user=pXXXXXXn --pass=oXXXXXXy accounts.ofx file accounts.ofx fipid 7392 contacting partner server... fid 6812 org HAN url http://moneycentral.msn.com/cust404.htm user pXXXXXXn pass oXXXXXXy The command above is with Bank Of America (not CA, ...). I also tried other BoA FID's. And I have an account with Chase that I tried. Chase use to be Bank One so I tried that too. I always get back (rougly speaking) the above reply. And, accounts.ofx is actually an html page for a page not found. Both of these accounts I can use via their on line banking and the chase account I can use via Quicken. So, I'm pretty sure the account and passwords are correct. Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong or how to debug this. Thank you, Perry Smith |
From: Martin P. <aqu...@gm...> - 2007-11-19 19:52:53
|
Hi, this is to inform you about the release of LibOFX 0.9.0. Changes are as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X8 This release now exports version information thus allowing depending applications to determine the version of LibOFX is is compiled against. Some fields have been added to OfxFiLogin to allow for modification of some OFX header fields in outgoing requests. Together with the latest AqBanking3 this should fix the problem with servers suddenly rejecting connections from LibOFX applications. The calling application can now tell libofx where the data files reside. This allows for relocatable binaries (most importantly on Windows). Some warnings from recent versions of GCC have been fixed. LibOFX can now easily be cross-compiled for Windows on Linux. The OFX header is now scanned for a hint regarding the encoding of the document and convert the data to UTF8 if iconv is available at compile time. The API for online requests has been cleaned up. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X8 LibOFX is available at "http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=61170" Please report problems or suggestions to the mailing list lib...@li... so that we can work on them. Regards Martin Preuss -- "Things are only impossible until they're not" Martin Preuss - http://www.aquamaniac.de/ AqBanking - http://www.aqbanking.de/ LibChipcard - http://www.libchipcard.de/ |
From: Martin P. <aqu...@gm...> - 2007-11-19 16:19:46
|
Hi, On Montag, 19. November 2007, Benoit Gr=E9goire wrote: [...] > > So the question is: Is 0.9.0 ok with you or do you have another proposa= l? > > Generally I did: > micro =3D bugfix and very minor features. > minor =3D new features and source-incompatible API changes. > > I don't mind which you chose, but API changes should have no influence on > the version number unless it's source-incompatible. [...] That's my policy also. Actually, we do have source incompatible changes=20 (introduced by Ace some time ago) so 0.9.0 sounds reasonable to me. Regards Martin =2D-=20 "Things are only impossible until they're not" Martin Preuss - http://www.aquamaniac.de/ AqBanking - http://www.aqbanking.de/ LibChipcard - http://www.libchipcard.de/ |
From: Benoit <bo...@st...> - 2007-11-19 16:04:07
|
> Thanks, will do. Since we changed the API in an incompatible way we have = to > increment the SO-Version of the library (and reset SO-AGE). We should > therefore also increment some higher part of the version (instead of > 0.8.x). > > What is your versioning policy? It looks to me that bugfix-only release > have an incrementing micro version (0.8.1->0.8.2) and that API changes > require the minor version to be incremented (so that the next release wou= ld > be 0.9.0?). > > So the question is: Is 0.9.0 ok with you or do you have another proposal? Generally I did: micro =3D bugfix and very minor features. minor =3D new features and source-incompatible API changes. I don't mind which you chose, but API changes should have no influence on t= he=20 version number unless it's source-incompatible. =2D-=20 Benoit Gr=E9goire Technologies Coeus inc. |
From: Benoit <bo...@st...> - 2007-11-19 14:53:23
|
On Friday 16 November 2007, Martin Preuss wrote: > Hi Benoit, > > On Dienstag, 13. November 2007, Martin Preuss wrote: > > Hi Benoit, > > > > what do you think about making a new release? > > [...] > > Did you have time to think about that? I did, and have no objections, but no time to run the process. If you do, = go=20 ahead. =2D-=20 Benoit Gr=E9goire Technologies Coeus inc. |
From: Martin P. <aqu...@gm...> - 2007-11-18 10:42:35
|
Hi Benoit, On Sonntag, 18. November 2007, Benoit Gr=E9goire wrote: [...] > > > what do you think about making a new release? > > > > [...] > > > > Did you have time to think about that? > > I did, and have no objections, but no time to run the process. If you do, > go ahead. [...] Thanks, will do. Since we changed the API in an incompatible way we have to= =20 increment the SO-Version of the library (and reset SO-AGE). We should=20 therefore also increment some higher part of the version (instead of 0.8.x). What is your versioning policy? It looks to me that bugfix-only release hav= e=20 an incrementing micro version (0.8.1->0.8.2) and that API changes require t= he=20 minor version to be incremented (so that the next release would be 0.9.0?). So the question is: Is 0.9.0 ok with you or do you have another proposal? Regards Martin =2D-=20 "Things are only impossible until they're not" Martin Preuss - http://www.aquamaniac.de/ AqBanking - http://www.aqbanking.de/ LibChipcard - http://www.libchipcard.de/ |
From: Martin P. <aqu...@gm...> - 2007-11-17 01:45:55
|
Hi Benoit, On Dienstag, 13. November 2007, Martin Preuss wrote: > Hi Benoit, > > what do you think about making a new release? [...] Did you have time to think about that? kind regards Martin -- "Things are only impossible until they're not" Martin Preuss - http://www.aquamaniac.de/ AqBanking - http://www.aqbanking.de/ LibChipcard - http://www.libchipcard.de/ |
From: Martin P. <aqu...@gm...> - 2007-11-13 06:13:28
|
Hi Benoit, what do you think about making a new release? I'm asking this because there have been some changes (some made by Ace some time ago, some made by myself in the last weeks) which seem to be important enough to warrant a release. Most importantly libofx now allows adjusting some of the OFX header fields which might be solve the problems with some servers which no longer accept connections from the latest stable release... Regards Martin -- "Things are only impossible until they're not" Martin Preuss - http://www.aquamaniac.de/ AqBanking - http://www.aqbanking.de/ LibChipcard - http://www.libchipcard.de/ |
From: Benoit <bo...@st...> - 2007-11-01 23:56:32
|
On Wednesday 31 October 2007, David Reiser wrote: > I've been having some problems with either my network port or my > system software, so I commandeered my wife's intel mac to build libofx > HEAD and try the beta of aqbanking. > > I set up everything the way it is on my mac (a slightly older PPC > based mac), checked out the source, ran autogen and configure (cutting > and pasting the same env's and switches as I successfully used > before). But when I run make, I end up with: > > gcc -g -O2 -o .libs/ofx2qif ofx2qif.o ../lib/.libs/libofx.dylib -L/sw/ > lib /sw/lib/libosp.dylib -lpthread /sw/lib/libintl.dylib -lc /sw/lib/ > libiconv.dylib -lstdc++ > creating ofx2qif > Making all in ofxdump > make[2]: *** No rule to make target `cmdline.c', needed by > `cmdline.o'. Stop. > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > > am I missing a dependency? I was pretty sure I had all of them covered > because I built 0.8.3 via fink (and then removed just libofx to build > Head outside of fink). any other ideas? You need gengetopt to build from CVS (it's not needed when building from th= e=20 tarball). =2D-=20 Benoit Gr=E9goire Technologies Coeus inc. |
From: David R. <dbr...@ea...> - 2007-10-31 04:19:54
|
I've been having some problems with either my network port or my system software, so I commandeered my wife's intel mac to build libofx HEAD and try the beta of aqbanking. I set up everything the way it is on my mac (a slightly older PPC based mac), checked out the source, ran autogen and configure (cutting and pasting the same env's and switches as I successfully used before). But when I run make, I end up with: gcc -g -O2 -o .libs/ofx2qif ofx2qif.o ../lib/.libs/libofx.dylib -L/sw/ lib /sw/lib/libosp.dylib -lpthread /sw/lib/libintl.dylib -lc /sw/lib/ libiconv.dylib -lstdc++ creating ofx2qif Making all in ofxdump make[2]: *** No rule to make target `cmdline.c', needed by `cmdline.o'. Stop. make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 am I missing a dependency? I was pretty sure I had all of them covered because I built 0.8.3 via fink (and then removed just libofx to build Head outside of fink). any other ideas? Dave -- David Reiser dbr...@ea... |
From: Martin P. <aqu...@gm...> - 2007-10-27 12:52:42
|
Hi, On Samstag, 27. Oktober 2007, Christian Stimming wrote: [...] > Just for the record: The current gnucash windows binary already contains > libofx and OFX DirectConnect. The build script for the windows binary does > this by compiling and installing opensp-1.5.2 and libofx-0.8.3, but both > with a manual patch file, which can be found in gnucash's directory > packaging/win32 directory, respectively. (Gnucash svn server is offline > this weekend.) [...] Hmm, but how did you overcome the limitation of the old Libofx version in regard to looking up the dtd-files? LibOFX had no means to let you dynamically set the DTD-folder (it does *now*), and neither did it check any registry keys (it still doesn't, but now it doesn't have to). Regards Martin -- "Things are only impossible until they're not" Martin Preuss - http://www.aquamaniac.de/ AqBanking - http://www.aqbanking.de/ LibChipcard - http://www.libchipcard.de/ |
From: Martin P. <aqu...@gm...> - 2007-10-27 11:40:57
|
Hi, I have just checked in some changes to the CVS repository of LibOFX: * libofx.h, ofx_utilities.cpp: replaced some char* with "const char*" to make GCC happy, wrapped arithmetic calculations in macro definitions in brackets to avoid problems * libofx.h: Removed this file, replaced it with libofx.h.in. This is used to create libofx.h which now includes some subst variables conveying the version of LibOFX to source files. Introduced LIBOFX_BUILD_VERSION and LIBOFX_VERSION_RELEASE_STRING to distinguish even CVS versions. Added function libofx_set_dtd_dir() which allows to set the folder in which DTD files are stored. This is needed for local installations (e.g. WIN32) * libofx.pc.in: depending libraries don't need to link against OpenSP themselves, since LibOFX encapsulates it, no need to propagate unnecessary dependencies With these changes I was able to compile LibOFX for WIN32, so future versions of GnuCash may be shipped with a WIN32 which actually supports OFX Direct Connect on that platform, too :-) However, you will need for GnuCash to adjust to AqBanking3 in order to benefit from the changes. Regards Martin -- "Things are only impossible until they're not" Martin Preuss - http://www.aquamaniac.de/ AqBanking - http://www.aqbanking.de/ LibChipcard - http://www.libchipcard.de/ |
From: Jason E. <vip...@gm...> - 2007-08-21 20:12:57
|
> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:59:11 +0200 > From: Maciej Gawinecki <mga...@gm...> > Subject: [Libofx-devel] ofx - file or active statement > To: lib...@li... > Message-ID: <46C...@gm...> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed > > Hi, > > I just want to make sure about my knowledge and understanding of account > statements and standards. > > 1. OFX is both file format for statements and a protocol for requesting > and responsing with statements, is that right ? > Correct > 2. Active statement means I don't have to download statement into a file > and than import it into a finansial program, but I can download > statement directly with the program, is that right ? > Correct....Active statement is a term coined by M$ if I remember correctly > 3. OFX allows for both: active and static (file) statement ? > Ususally the protocol is between a program and server, however some banks offer the ability to download the OFX data as a file. > Thank you, > > Maciej Hope that all helps...... -- My Website http://www.codelandia.com Jennys Website http://www.dontbflat.com |
From: Maciej G. <mga...@gm...> - 2007-08-21 06:59:25
|
Hi, I just want to make sure about my knowledge and understanding of account statements and standards. 1. OFX is both file format for statements and a protocol for requesting and responsing with statements, is that right ? 2. Active statement means I don't have to download statement into a file and than import it into a finansial program, but I can download statement directly with the program, is that right ? 3. OFX allows for both: active and static (file) statement ? Thank you, Maciej |
From: David R. <dbr...@ea...> - 2007-08-08 14:24:02
|
On 8 Aug 2007, at 6:50:49 AM, Maciej Gawinecki wrote: > Hi, > > OFX standard defines three dates in a statement > > DTAVAIL - Date funds are available, > DTPOSTED - Date transaction was posted to account > DTUSER - Date user initiated transaction > > My bank provides a statements with the following dates: > > Ordered Date -- date on which transaction had to be executed (could be > Sunday) > Execution Date -- date on which transaction was executed > > My questions: > 1. Which date relates to which ? > 2. Which date is imported by GnuCash and shown in list of transaction > for particular account ? > 3. Should a statement from my bank contain date of booking a > transaction ? > > TIA, > > Maciej > DTUSER matches ordered date DTPOSTED matches execution date looks like gnucash only incorporates DTAVAIL as part of the transaction note, if that date info appears in the transaction list Dave -- David Reiser dbr...@ea... |
From: Maciej G. <mga...@gm...> - 2007-08-08 10:50:59
|
Hi, OFX standard defines three dates in a statement DTAVAIL - Date funds are available, DTPOSTED - Date transaction was posted to account DTUSER - Date user initiated transaction My bank provides a statements with the following dates: Ordered Date -- date on which transaction had to be executed (could be Sunday) Execution Date -- date on which transaction was executed My questions: 1. Which date relates to which ? 2. Which date is imported by GnuCash and shown in list of transaction for particular account ? 3. Should a statement from my bank contain date of booking a transaction ? TIA, Maciej |
From: Jason E. <vip...@gm...> - 2007-08-04 21:54:46
|
Yes the OFX data is formatted in SGML.....but that is only for header 100. Header 200 files are formated XML. Not all banks support this. Also, some banks are very picky on following the specification so, be warned. Maciej Gawinecki wrote: > Hi, > > I found information that OFX files are formatted in SGML. > But when I take a look on example of OFX file I cames out that: > header is not formated in SGML > > Am I wrong ? Hmm. I think the technicality is that the financial information (starting with <OFX>, after the header) is formatted in SGML. But an OFX file consists of a header plus financial information. I don't know SGML at all, but I think that the ofx file header itself is not SGML. But that header is explicitly compliant with the OFX spec. > > BTW, does any one knows what happened to OFX Specification site > www.ofx.net/ofx/default.asp > ??? > > I've been receiving " (110) Connection timed out" for 2-3 last days. > > Anyone knows mirror of this specification ? Not exactly, but I think I have a pdf of the 2.x ofx spec at home. I can email you a copy if you would like me to (provided I really did save it...) > > Regards, > > Maciej > > -------------- > > Below example for considerations (generated by MT2OFX app from CSV file): > > OFXHEADER:100 > DATA:OFXSGML > VERSION:102 > SECURITY:NONE > ENCODING:USASCII > CHARSET:1252 > COMPRESSION:NONE > OLDFILEUID:NONE > NEWFILEUID:NONE > > ... > > <BANKACCTFROM> > <BANKID>PKO-INtel > <ACCTID>XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > <ACCTTYPE>CHECKING > </BANKACCTFROM> > |
From: Dave R. <dbr...@ea...> - 2007-08-03 20:40:51
|
Maciej Gawinecki wrote: > Hi, > > I found information that OFX files are formatted in SGML. > But when I take a look on example of OFX file I cames out that: > header is not formated in SGML > > Am I wrong ? Hmm. I think the technicality is that the financial information (starting with <OFX>, after the header) is formatted in SGML. But an OFX file consists of a header plus financial information. I don't know SGML at all, but I think that the ofx file header itself is not SGML. But that header is explicitly compliant with the OFX spec. > > BTW, does any one knows what happened to OFX Specification site > www.ofx.net/ofx/default.asp > ??? > > I've been receiving " (110) Connection timed out" for 2-3 last days. > > Anyone knows mirror of this specification ? Not exactly, but I think I have a pdf of the 2.x ofx spec at home. I can email you a copy if you would like me to (provided I really did save it...) > > Regards, > > Maciej > > -------------- > > Below example for considerations (generated by MT2OFX app from CSV file): > > OFXHEADER:100 > DATA:OFXSGML > VERSION:102 > SECURITY:NONE > ENCODING:USASCII > CHARSET:1252 > COMPRESSION:NONE > OLDFILEUID:NONE > NEWFILEUID:NONE > > ... > > <BANKACCTFROM> > <BANKID>PKO-INtel > <ACCTID>50102055581111123027600041 > <ACCTTYPE>CHECKING > </BANKACCTFROM> > Dave -- David Reiser dbr...@ea... |
From: Maciej G. <mga...@gm...> - 2007-08-03 19:47:19
|
Hi, I found information that OFX files are formatted in SGML. But when I take a look on example of OFX file I cames out that: header is not formated in SGML Am I wrong ? BTW, does any one knows what happened to OFX Specification site www.ofx.net/ofx/default.asp ??? I've been receiving " (110) Connection timed out" for 2-3 last days. Anyone knows mirror of this specification ? Regards, Maciej -------------- Below example for considerations (generated by MT2OFX app from CSV file): OFXHEADER:100 DATA:OFXSGML VERSION:102 SECURITY:NONE ENCODING:USASCII CHARSET:1252 COMPRESSION:NONE OLDFILEUID:NONE NEWFILEUID:NONE ... <BANKACCTFROM> <BANKID>PKO-INtel <ACCTID>50102055581111123027600041 <ACCTTYPE>CHECKING </BANKACCTFROM> |