You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2004 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
2005 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(44) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(17) |
2006 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(7) |
2007 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(7) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(9) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Christian S. <chr...@cs...> - 2011-03-01 20:50:38
|
Am Dienstag, 1. März 2011 schrieb Benoit Grégoire: > On March 1, 2011 06:16:16 AM Christian Stimming wrote: > > Hi Benoit et al., > > > > I propose to move the libofx repository from a (age-old) CVS system to > > GIT directly. If nobody objects, I'd implement this according to the > > instructions here [1]. I won't rehash the age-old discussion of why > > CVS is a bad version control system. I just got into how to set up GIT > > on sourceforge, so I'll propose to use that one instead and I > > volunteer to implement this as well. > > I had started on this, but if you have time to do it by all means do so. > The only time consuming part is writing the email address translation > file. Ok, I have the git repository ready here for git push. However, I'm not a project admin of the sourceforge libofx project, which means I can't activate the GIT repository in the project. Can you activate it (under "Project Admin" -> "Features"), or add me as an admin to the libofx project? Thanks! Christian |
From: Benoit G. <be...@co...> - 2011-03-01 15:56:17
|
On March 1, 2011 06:16:16 AM Christian Stimming wrote: > Hi Benoit et al., > > I propose to move the libofx repository from a (age-old) CVS system to > GIT directly. If nobody objects, I'd implement this according to the > instructions here [1]. I won't rehash the age-old discussion of why > CVS is a bad version control system. I just got into how to set up GIT > on sourceforge, so I'll propose to use that one instead and I > volunteer to implement this as well. I had started on this, but if you have time to do it by all means do so. The only time consuming part is writing the email address translation file. -- Benoit Grégoire, ing., PMP, PSM |
From: Christian S. <chr...@cs...> - 2011-03-01 11:48:22
|
Hi Benoit et al., I propose to move the libofx repository from a (age-old) CVS system to GIT directly. If nobody objects, I'd implement this according to the instructions here [1]. I won't rehash the age-old discussion of why CVS is a bad version control system. I just got into how to set up GIT on sourceforge, so I'll propose to use that one instead and I volunteer to implement this as well. Best Regards, Christian [1] http://michael-bien.com/mbien/entry/converting_from_cvs_to_git |
From: Benoit G. <be...@co...> - 2011-02-13 21:16:16
|
Ok, since LibOFX 0.9.2 has been released (thanks Christian), here's a proper release note: LibOFX 0.9.2: - Win32: Add gnucash patch that looks up the dtd installation directory from the current executable's location. - Apply patch by Geert Janssens to fix a crash on invalid date format - Apply patch by ajseward with some additional fixes to allow wraping the library in python. - Apply patch by Thomas Baumgart which fixes bug #5 (Transaction posting date off by one) - Apply patch by Bill Nottingham <no...@re...> with various C++ include fixes for building with recent compilers. LibOFX 0.9.1: - Add more sanity checks on string length. - Fix gnucash crash on OFX files with non-ascii characters and very long lines. See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528306 and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493597. Patch by Jerome Vouillon copied from the latter. -- Benoit Grégoire, ing., PMP, PSM |
From: brad <bra...@fa...> - 2011-01-21 17:03:46
|
Thx, that worked. On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 17:44 +0100, Martin Preuss wrote: > Hi, > > On Freitag 21 Januar 2011, brad wrote: > [...] > > LibOFX ERROR: ofx_proc_file(): FATAL: Missing DTD, aborting > > (Above message occured on Line 4294967295, Column 4294967295) > [...] > > Did you ran "sudo make install" before the test? Otherwise the DTD files might > not be at the place where your self-compiled version expects them... > > > Regards > Martin > > |
From: Martin P. <aqu...@gm...> - 2011-01-21 16:45:10
|
Hi, On Freitag 21 Januar 2011, brad wrote: [...] > LibOFX ERROR: ofx_proc_file(): FATAL: Missing DTD, aborting > (Above message occured on Line 4294967295, Column 4294967295) [...] Did you ran "sudo make install" before the test? Otherwise the DTD files might not be at the place where your self-compiled version expects them... Regards Martin -- "Things are only impossible until they're not" Martin Preuss - http://www2.aquamaniac.de/ AqBanking - http://www.aqbanking.de/ LibChipcard - http://www.libchipcard.de/ |
From: brad <bra...@fa...> - 2011-01-21 03:41:28
|
I found this http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=150530&action=view Looks very similar. I reverted back to libofx-0.9.0 and now I can get it to build, but now I get this error when running: ofxdump test.ofx LibOFX INFO: libofx_proc_file(): File format not specified, autodecting... (Above message occured on Line 4294967295, Column 4294967295) LibOFX INFO: libofx_proc_file(): Detected file format: OFX (Open Financial eXchange (OFX or QFX)) (Above message occured on Line 4294967295, Column 4294967295) LibOFX ERROR: find_dtd():Unable to find the DTD named opensp.dcl (Above message occured on Line 4294967295, Column 4294967295) LibOFX ERROR: find_dtd():Unable to find the DTD named ofx160.dtd (Above message occured on Line 4294967295, Column 4294967295) LibOFX ERROR: ofx_proc_file(): FATAL: Missing DTD, aborting (Above message occured on Line 4294967295, Column 4294967295) If I run the ofxdump that's installed by the apt-get it works with the same file. LibOFX INFO: libofx_proc_file(): File format forced to: OFX (Open Financial eXchange (OFX or QFX)) (Above message occured on Line 4294967295, Column 4294967295) LibOFX STATUS: find_dtd():DTD found: /usr/share/libofx4/0.9.0/dtd/opensp.dcl (Above message occured on Line 4294967295, Column 4294967295) LibOFX STATUS: find_dtd():DTD found: /usr/share/libofx4/0.9.0/dtd/ofx160.dtd (Above message occured on Line 4294967295, Column 4294967295) I ran configure w/ --prefix and I see opensp.dcl & the other in a local dtd directory. How do I configure it to find these files? On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 18:14 -0700, brad wrote: > I should of mentioned, I'm using ubuntu 10.04 > > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 21:29 -0700, brad wrote: > > Can anybody give me a quick hint on this build error? > > > > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I../inc -I/usr/include/OpenSP > > -DMAKEFILE_DTD_PATH=\"/usr/local/share/libofx/dtd/\" -g -O2 -MT > > ofx_utilities.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ofx_utilities.Tpo -c > > ofx_utilities.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ofx_utilities.o > > ofx_utilities.cpp: In function 'time_t ofxdate_to_time_t(std::string)': > > ofx_utilities.cpp:116: error: 'time' is not a member of 'std' > > ofx_utilities.cpp:120: error: 'atoi' was not declared in this scope > > ofx_utilities.cpp:139: error: 'atof' was not declared in this scope > > > > There were a few more error msgs. Everything above this compiled OK. > > > |
From: brad <bra...@fa...> - 2011-01-21 01:27:44
|
I should of mentioned, I'm using ubuntu 10.04 On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 21:29 -0700, brad wrote: > Can anybody give me a quick hint on this build error? > > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I../inc -I/usr/include/OpenSP > -DMAKEFILE_DTD_PATH=\"/usr/local/share/libofx/dtd/\" -g -O2 -MT > ofx_utilities.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ofx_utilities.Tpo -c > ofx_utilities.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ofx_utilities.o > ofx_utilities.cpp: In function 'time_t ofxdate_to_time_t(std::string)': > ofx_utilities.cpp:116: error: 'time' is not a member of 'std' > ofx_utilities.cpp:120: error: 'atoi' was not declared in this scope > ofx_utilities.cpp:139: error: 'atof' was not declared in this scope > > There were a few more error msgs. Everything above this compiled OK. > |
From: Perry S. <pe...@ea...> - 2011-01-20 23:42:36
|
What platform? On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:29 PM, brad wrote: > Can anybody give me a quick hint on this build error? > > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I../inc -I/usr/include/OpenSP > -DMAKEFILE_DTD_PATH=\"/usr/local/share/libofx/dtd/\" -g -O2 -MT > ofx_utilities.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ofx_utilities.Tpo -c > ofx_utilities.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ofx_utilities.o > ofx_utilities.cpp: In function 'time_t ofxdate_to_time_t(std::string)': > ofx_utilities.cpp:116: error: 'time' is not a member of 'std' > ofx_utilities.cpp:120: error: 'atoi' was not declared in this scope > ofx_utilities.cpp:139: error: 'atof' was not declared in this scope > > There were a few more error msgs. Everything above this compiled OK. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks > Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand > malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you > can protect your company and customers by using code signing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl > _______________________________________________ > Libofx-devel mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libofx-devel |
From: brad <bra...@fa...> - 2011-01-20 04:43:01
|
Can anybody give me a quick hint on this build error? g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I../inc -I/usr/include/OpenSP -DMAKEFILE_DTD_PATH=\"/usr/local/share/libofx/dtd/\" -g -O2 -MT ofx_utilities.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ofx_utilities.Tpo -c ofx_utilities.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ofx_utilities.o ofx_utilities.cpp: In function 'time_t ofxdate_to_time_t(std::string)': ofx_utilities.cpp:116: error: 'time' is not a member of 'std' ofx_utilities.cpp:120: error: 'atoi' was not declared in this scope ofx_utilities.cpp:139: error: 'atof' was not declared in this scope There were a few more error msgs. Everything above this compiled OK. |
From: Gérald N. <ger...@ge...> - 2011-01-15 13:12:49
|
Bonjour, je suis le mainteneur des version Mac OS X de Grisbi (http://www.grisbi.org). J'utilise l'environnement de développement gtk-osx et ige-mac-bundle pour produire les bundle. Pas de soucis particulier pour inclure la libofx dans le bundle. Cependant, lorsque Grisbi est exécuté depuis le bundle la libofx ne trouve pas les DTD. Est-ce qu'il y a un moyen de forcer la recherche des DTD dans le bundle ? @+ -- Gérald Niel ger...@ge... |
From: Benoit G. <be...@co...> - 2010-04-30 18:00:40
|
On February 2, 2010 01:23:49 pm Yuri R wrote: > The patch is attached. > > Please note that I removed auto-generated files: > > inc/libofx.h > ofxconnect/cmdline.c > ofxconnect/cmdline.h > ofxdump/cmdline.c > ofxdump/cmdline.h > > My changes should not affect existing clients because I haven't changed > existing data structures/classes (except OfxMainContainer that holds new > containers). > > My main worry is how I implemented linking of nested data structures, > how this linking is reflected in the corresponding container classes, > and how these containers are stored in OfxMainContainer. Examples of > linked data structures: OfxOptionData => OfxSecurityData, OfxPosOptData > => OfxInvPosData. I'm not sure if my implementation is in line with the > library's original design. Any feedback on this would be greatly > appreciated. Well, I hardly play with libofx anymore. But generally speaking, as long as the code works, and the public api is consistent, I don't think anyone is going to be fussy for style. The design of the library is rather antiquated anyway. -- Benoit Grégoire |
From: Mister R. <end...@gm...> - 2010-02-27 19:33:37
|
I recently had to get libofx built on ubuntu karmic koala. I had a number of errors in different source files related to missing header #includes. I fixed them and got it building - it was mostly related to undefined C functions. I've attached the patch - hopefully it'll help someone in the future. -Eli Ribble |
From: Yuri R <yu...@gm...> - 2010-02-02 01:14:13
|
Hello, I've made some changes to libofx-0.9.1.tar.gz in order to process OFX files from my financial institution and would like someone who is actively working on the library to review them. I tried to contact Benoit several times at bo...@st... without success. Please little r me and I'll be glad to send you a patch. Thank you, Yuri |
From: Rick G. <ri...@al...> - 2009-12-15 23:57:49
|
I am trying to evaluate the Direct Connect functionality in libofx. I tries building it from scratch at which point I realized that I needed OpenSP. So then I thought to look in MacPorts to see if it was there. Sure enough it was. And it created the ofx2qif and ofxdump commands. But no ofxconnect. So I went back to try to compile from source but couldn't figure out what flags configure wanted to tell it to use the opensp that macports had built. Does it not compile ofxconnect from scratch? I could modify the macport port file to get it to build ofxconnect but I'm not sure what I would need to do to get that to happen. Is this the right list to be sending a problem such as this? Thanks, Rick |
From: David R. <dbr...@ea...> - 2009-10-14 02:42:58
|
On Oct 13, 2009, at 10:07 PM, Nick Brown wrote: > I notice that there is a ofx2qif utility, but is the reverse possible? > > Cheers, > Nick > Not without creating missing information. Most notably, ofx transactions have a unique ID. qif transactions do not. So you'd have to decide how you wanted to create the IDs. They only have to be unique per account, but how will you ensure that you know which account is which over time? I'm pretty sure there are other impediments, but the missing IDs are an issue. -- David Reiser dbr...@ea... |
From: Nick B. <nic...@gm...> - 2009-10-14 02:08:08
|
I notice that there is a ofx2qif utility, but is the reverse possible? Cheers, Nick |
From: ajs2 <ajs...@us...> - 2009-09-10 23:29:26
|
Here is a start at wrapping it with SWIG. http://www.nabble.com/file/p25392659/libofx-python-0.0.2.tar.gz libofx-python-0.0.2.tar.gz idm wrote: > > Any progress on this project? Have you looked into SWIG for generating > this wrapper? I was looking into this last night, but I've never used > SWIG before and I don't know how easy it is to wrap the many structs that > appear in libofx.h. My suspicion is that it will save you time, and I > expect the C file generated by SWIG will be portable (so it can be bundled > with your module). > > At any rate, I'm interested to hear more. > > -Ian > > > Nick Kirsch-2 wrote: >> >> I'd like to build a Python wrapper for libofx. The wrapper will be >> written in >> C and will simply wrap each structure with a corresponding Python object >> with >> fields of the same name. I'll also wrap the callback functions and load >> function. >> >> The module will be called "Ofx" and each class will be the same as their >> Ofx >> container: Account, Statement, etc. >> >> One wrinkle is the valid check - I will likely implement this such that >> if a >> field is accessed that isn't valid, it throws an exception. >> >> Comments? Suggestions? Is someone else building this? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Nick >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, >> CA >> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the >> Enterprise >> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source >> participation >> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: >> SFAD >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >> _______________________________________________ >> Libofx-devel mailing list >> Lib...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libofx-devel >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/python-wrapper--tp22193421p25392659.html Sent from the LibOFX - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
From: idm <ian...@gm...> - 2009-05-12 15:11:44
|
Any progress on this project? Have you looked into SWIG for generating this wrapper? I was looking into this last night, but I've never used SWIG before and I don't know how easy it is to wrap the many structs that appear in libofx.h. My suspicion is that it will save you time, and I expect the C file generated by SWIG will be portable (so it can be bundled with your module). At any rate, I'm interested to hear more. -Ian Nick Kirsch-2 wrote: > > I'd like to build a Python wrapper for libofx. The wrapper will be written > in > C and will simply wrap each structure with a corresponding Python object > with > fields of the same name. I'll also wrap the callback functions and load > function. > > The module will be called "Ofx" and each class will be the same as their > Ofx > container: Account, Statement, etc. > > One wrinkle is the valid check - I will likely implement this such that if > a > field is accessed that isn't valid, it throws an exception. > > Comments? Suggestions? Is someone else building this? > > Thanks. > > Nick > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, > CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the > Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source > participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: > SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > _______________________________________________ > Libofx-devel mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libofx-devel > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/python-wrapper--tp22193421p23504523.html Sent from the LibOFX - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
From: <md...@fr...> - 2009-03-09 19:47:56
|
Hi, I would like to create an ofx file, but can find any good starting point to do this. I mean a sample code (like ofx2qif) and a section in the documentation or a tutorial. Thanks. |
From: Nick K. <ni...@ki...> - 2009-02-24 23:51:12
|
I'd like to build a Python wrapper for libofx. The wrapper will be written in C and will simply wrap each structure with a corresponding Python object with fields of the same name. I'll also wrap the callback functions and load function. The module will be called "Ofx" and each class will be the same as their Ofx container: Account, Statement, etc. One wrinkle is the valid check - I will likely implement this such that if a field is accessed that isn't valid, it throws an exception. Comments? Suggestions? Is someone else building this? Thanks. Nick |
From: <md...@fr...> - 2009-02-21 17:39:07
|
Hi, I would like to create an ofx file, but can find any good starting point to do this. I mean a sample code (like ofx2qif) and a section in the documentation or a tutorial. Thanks. |
From: Morgan F. <iho...@gm...> - 2009-02-14 04:02:29
|
I did not see any new posts after Feb 2008. Is there a new list for libofx? Thanks, ihome |
From: Parand D. <pa...@xp...> - 2008-02-14 07:00:48
|
Hello, I need to generate OFX for import into Quicken, MS Money, etc. I noticed examples of parsing OFX in various ways, but not so generating. Could you point me in the right direction? Btw, is there a collection of sample OFX documents anywhere I can peruse? Also, are there any python bindings? Best, Parand |
From: Lance R. <lmr...@gm...> - 2008-01-21 15:26:04
|
Perry - thanks. The script worked for me, but is there another Url that gets the FI data used by Quicken 2007, similar to the Money url? Lance On Jan 20, 2008 10:07 PM, Perry Smith <pe...@ea...> wrote: > Again, I am not sure if this is new news. This sucks down the list of > Banks, etc from the Quicken 2007 site. > > This fails sometimes. I don't know why. This all seems way too > mysterious and flakey to me at this point. > > Enjoy, > Perry > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Libofx-devel mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libofx-devel > > -- Lance http://geekswithblogs.net/Lance/ |