From: Roy S. <roy...@ic...> - 2007-02-22 00:36:07
|
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Travis Austin wrote: > I've tested my patch by doing a 'make run_examples' using > petsc-2.1.6 and petsc-2.2.0. All of the examples run fine and > everything seems to be OK. The more recent petsc that I have tested > against was petsc-2.3.2-p6. > > I used default compilation in terms of OPT or DBG. Are there other > tests to run? The test coverage we get with "make run_examples" is abysmal, but it would have caught any obvious errors with those PETSc versions, and I haven't noticed any subtle errors with petsc-2.3.1. I'll commit your patch (with a slight assert() reordering John suggested) to CVS tonight; I don't think it'll break anyone else's code either. For those who want to experiment with algebraic multigrid, try the latest CVS. The options "-pc_type hypre -pc_hypre_type boomeramg" seem to be a good start. --- Roy |