From: Cody P. <cod...@gm...> - 2013-12-09 17:02:10
|
I'll vote "for" on dbg/devel modes. At least until things are cleaned up. Cody On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Roy Stogner <roy...@ic...>wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, Derek Gaston wrote: > > > I guess I'll vote against adding this to opt: but it's not a strong vote. > > My vote "for" isn't a strong vote, either. Ben seems fairly neutral, > so unless someone else chimes in on the "for" side I guess I'll leave > it be. > > No objections from anyone to me adding -Wconversion in dbg/devel > modes, though? > > > My main worry is that we'll spew tons of warnings from includes > > further upstream... > > In theory we'll eventually be able to shut those up with > ignore_warnings.h/restore_warnings.h. In practice those are nearly > useless with old compilers and we're not taking advantage of all the > control that the newest gcc allows. > --- > Roy > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK > Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base. > Download it for free now! > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-devel mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel > |