Re: [Libmesh-devel] DG-like terms in FEMContext?

[Roy S. <roy...@ic...>]

On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Paul T. Bauman wrote:

> I haven't really thought about it at all, but isn't there some common data that we ought to be able to provide in a
> subclass at the library level so as to facilitate DG methods?

Sure.  If David is feeling generous, the subclass should definitely
belong in the library.
---
Roy