From: Roy S. <roy...@ic...> - 2013-03-27 19:32:21
|
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Manav Bhatia wrote: > -- Also, I am being persistent with the (potential bug in) UnsteadySolver that I had sent an > email about earlier this month. I have included the proposed bug-fix in the patch, and hopefully > you will have a chance to test it out. I have had to include this to ensure consistency of my > code. I appreciate the persistence, and I believe you're seeing a problem, but this proposed fix just looks wrong. It's essentially doing the same current->old solution copy of an advance_timestep() without the user having called advance_timestep(), and without updating system.time, neither of which should ever happen. Any chance you could distill a problem code into something you could send me? There's got to be something different between your time+adaptivity loops and mine. --- Roy |