Re: [Libmesh-devel] C1 elements, second derivatives

[Roy S. <roy...@ic...>]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Benjamin S. Kirk wrote:

> Also, ex10 looks broken.  The initial solution is fine, but all the 
> subsequent time steps look like the interior solution is 0 and the boundary 
> conditions are then imposed.  My guess is that the solution projection is 
> having an issue?  The solution snapshots in ex9 and ex10 should be the same, 
> but it looks like the interior solution is all 0 in the case of ex10.

I think I've found the problem - When revisiting a DoF from a new
element I didn't recalculate it, but I did reset it, to zero.  Would
you take a look at the fix when you have time?

Thanks,
---
Roy Stogner