Re: [Libmesh-devel] fparser sample?

[Roy S. <roy...@ic...>]

On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Roy Stogner wrote:

> Anyone have preferences as to whether this method should be pure
> virtual (breaking backwards compatibility for users with
> FunctionBase subclasses) or have a libmesh_not_implemented() default
> (causing runtime breakage when users pass their FunctionBase
> subclasses into methods which try to clone them)?

This was a silly question - people with FunctionBase subclasses are
*already* going to have to edit them to handle the new templating.
Might as well go all-in.
---
Roy