From: John P. <pet...@cf...> - 2010-06-29 16:32:38
|
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Roy Stogner <roy...@ic...> wrote: > > But seriously: it would be quite reasonable to add a Parameters object > to each System as well, if you want. What I'd really like is a simple > API for querying parameters that would check the System first, then > check the EquationSystems second... maybe give a Parameters object an > optional Parameters* parent? Only thing I'd worry about is users wanting to redefine the 'built-in' parameters libmesh uses ("linear solver tolerance", "nonlinear solver tolerance", "linear solver maximum iterations", etc) on a per-System basis while the internals of libmesh keep using the parent ES value for those parameters. Might lead to confusion/misunderstanding but not bugs per se. -- John |