Re: [Libiptcdata-devel] A stupid question about binary distribution

[David M. <dc...@MI...>]

Yes, that would be fine with me.  It's basically analogous to
distributing binary packages ala Red Hat, etc.

If you do make any changes to the sources before generating that binary,
you'd have to provide the changes, but it sounds like you're not doing
that.

-David

On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 23:09 +0200, S=C3=A9bastien Maerten wrote:
> Another bothering question from the little frenchy ;)
>=20
> Having relatively few knowledge of licenses and juridical matters, =20
> I'd like to ask if it is possible to legaly "give" the iptc in binary =20
> form only, giving pointers to the sf project for the source.
>=20
> The reason I'm asking this is because I'm looking for feedback on a =20
> script I'm develloping and this script uses the iptc cli tool.
> I seem to loose many valuable testers because of their fear of =20
> building libiptcdata (Mac OS X users may be really far from command =20
> line tools and terminals).
>=20
> In case you wonder, there's no matter of money or closed source here, =20
> just a matter of simplifying life to "end users".
>=20
> Any opinion would be greatly appreciated.=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Dow=
nload
> it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
> Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
> _______________________________________________
> Libiptcdata-devel mailing list
> Lib...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libiptcdata-devel