|
From: Stefan L. <st...@lu...> - 2005-04-05 05:26:07
|
Reply handling error. Should go to the list. On Montag, 4. April 2005 07:59, Roman Shaposhnick wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 07:41:08AM +0200, Stefan Lucke wrote: > > On Montag, 4. April 2005 03:02, Roman Shaposhnick wrote: > > > <F2On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:14:44AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote: > > > > Anyway, what do others think? =9AIs this an issue? =9AIs there a = way to get > > > > around it so interlaced material is encoded correctly to DV by li= bdv? > > > =9A=20 > > > =9A Oh, yeah! Use ffmpeg :-) > >=20 > > Roman, this list should cover libdv development related things. > > To me it is rather annoying as your default answer to questions like: > > Q: I've a problem using libdv with .. > > A: Use ffmpeg .. > =9A=20 > =9A Well, I understand your feelings and attachment to the libdv, > =9A and I can really see that "Oh yeah!" style can be considered > =9A inappropriate by some. At the same time, all I can really > =9A offer to mitigate your concerns is to start making these suggestion= s > =9A in private without Cc'ing to the mailing list. Yes, my mail was rather emotional triggered. I didn't want to offend you. If thats the case I'm really sorry for that. --=20 Stefan Lucke |