|
From: Alastair M. <am...@pe...> - 2001-05-31 16:44:58
|
Following up to my post yesterday about export to a camcorder vs to
a DV-bridge, I've found that a lot of the timing/sync problems seem
to be due to disk performance -- although there's never a complaint
about dropped frames.
The DV-bridge (Dazzle's Hollywood) still works better than my Sony
TRV103 camcorder, but I found a major difference between the two
PCs I was testing on. Curiously, the one with the better CPU and
more memory does *worse* -- a file that exported perfectly to the
DV-bridge on the "slower" (CPU) machine gave repeated interruptions and
lost data on the "faster" (CPU) one.
I ran 'hdparm -t' and 'hdparm -T' to find the disk timing, and that
seems to be the critical difference. The numbers:
Export works Export fails/scrambled
Buffer-cache read 43.4 MB/sec 20.0 MB/sec
Buffered disk read 8.3 MB/sec 6.6 MB/sec
The timing on both is bad enough that exporting to the camcorder is
pointless, but I do get a few more frames (although scrambled) on
the machine with faster disk. (In both cases the file is larger
than available RAM).
Neither Kino nor dvconnect complain about transfer problems.
I do have a faster machine I can try after I move the 1394 card
(102 MB/sec cache reads, 15.4 MB/sec disk reads), which I can also
put a SCSI drive on, but I won't have time to try that before I
go out of town for a week. I'm hoping the camcorder works there.
Bottom line: camcorder is still more sensitive to timing than is
the DV bridge, but disk (and bus) performance has a *major* effect on
whether either is usable.
Hope this helps somebody,
-- Alastair
|