Re: [libdc1394-devel] Minor API tweaks
Capture and control API for IIDC compliant cameras
Brought to you by:
ddouxchamps,
gordp
From: Peter A. <the...@us...> - 2007-09-17 20:47:29
|
On Monday 17 September 2007 10:44:05 David Moore wrote: > > I'm not familiar with doxygen or gtk-doc so I don't mind either. We > > could even have both if that's possible. Otherwise I let you and Peter > > Antoniac decide which doc generator to use. > > Yeah, we can definitely try both. =A0But I guess the burden is on me to > implement the gtk-doc bits. =A0:) =A0Luckily, I think the C-comment markup > looks roughly the same for both. Hmm, I've heard that gtk-doc has better C generation docs than Doxygen. I j= ust=20 picked doxygen as I thought it was more popular and it was easy to integrat= e.=20 The problem that we have is not so much in the tool, but who does the=20 documentation :) When I did the doxygen integration there was a promise fro= m=20 someone on the list to write the comments in the code. Since then, nothing= =20 happened, so, whoever is doing the comments, can pick the tool they like :) Cheers, Peter |