This output represents the average ERR@10 for the training runs and the RR@10 for
the test runs over the three folds.
Only the average for the test runs is shown under totals (which is a bit misleading).
I used a feature file of only 8 out of a possible 44 features in my test data.
If you are not using a current version of RankLib, perhaps the three items represent those averages over each of the folds? Do you get four values if you use four folds?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I used the -kcv option to get the result of a ranker.
Except each result for each folder, there's a final result such as:
Total: 0.9975 0.08 0.9975
What's the meaning of the three outputs?
This result does not look familiar to me for saved model text.
Did you get any information at the top of the output file that listed algorithm name and settings? What were they?
What version of RankLib are you using and which particular algorithm did you select?
The latest RankLib version is 2.5.
I have the same question about the meaning of the outputs.
What precisely did you run?
For example,
The output is:
What is the meaning of these last three outputs??
Thanks!
Last edit: Jose M 2016-04-18
Again, what version of RankLib are you using?
For the latest snapshot (RankLib-2.7-SNAPSHOT) the output I obtained using
This output represents the average ERR@10 for the training runs and the RR@10 for
the test runs over the three folds.
Only the average for the test runs is shown under totals (which is a bit misleading).
I used a feature file of only 8 out of a possible 44 features in my test data.
If you are not using a current version of RankLib, perhaps the three items represent those averages over each of the folds? Do you get four values if you use four folds?
When I use CV with 5 folds (-kcv 5), shows three values again:
Have you made the run using the latest RankLib snapshot?
You still haven't mentioned what version you are using.