From: Erich T. <eri...@th...> - 2019-11-28 12:02:24
Attachments:
smime.p7s
|
Hi The kernel compile for unpacked-next aka next aka possibly mmaster by now shows to be dependent on openssl headers. If these headers are not present on the compile system the compile fails. IMHO we should make kernel dependent on openssl and use the headers generated in the openssl build. cheers ET |
From: KP K. <ka...@us...> - 2019-11-30 15:04:50
|
Hi Erich; On Do, 2019-11-28 at 13:02 +0100, Erich Titl wrote: > Hi > > The kernel compile for unpacked-next aka next aka possibly mmaster by > now shows to be dependent on openssl headers. If these headers are > not > present on the compile system the compile fails. IMHO we should make > kernel dependent on openssl and use the headers generated in the > openssl > build. unpacked-next is the repository you can try and test whatever is needed to get the kernel compiled. It will not disturb any other yet. Are you afraid of or has seen any cons to build openssl before the kernel? kp > cheers > > ET > > _______________________________________________ > leaf-devel mailing list > lea...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel |
From: KP K. <ka...@us...> - 2019-11-30 18:22:43
|
Mv'ed to leaf-devel On Sa, 2019-11-30 at 17:11 +0100, Erich Titl wrote: > > Am 30.11.2019 um 16:04 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer via leaf-devel: > > Hi Erich; > > > > On Do, 2019-11-28 at 13:02 +0100, Erich Titl wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > The kernel compile for unpacked-next aka next aka possibly > > > mmaster by > > > now shows to be dependent on openssl headers. If these headers > > > are > > > not > > > present on the compile system the compile fails. IMHO we should > > > make > > > kernel dependent on openssl and use the headers generated in the > > > openssl > > > build. > > > > unpacked-next is the repository you can try and test whatever is > > needed > > to get the kernel compiled. It will not disturb any other yet. > > > > Are you afraid of or has seen any cons to build openssl before the > > kernel? > > No I just wanted to give you a heads-up as apparently this was > something > which has not been observed yet. I bet it happens in every branch, it > is > just masked if there is libssl-dev (in ubuntu) installed on the > development system and I feel like this header should _not_ be used. > I > would call it a bug. Ok; dare to commit to master as well? kp > ET > |