Re: [Lcms-user] Lcms distribution package size

[Noel C. <NCa...@Pr...>]

Hi Marti,

Not to go against the grain, but I think the practice of providing the
documentation along with the code is good.  It's all in one place and
everyone knows what goes together.  That being said, we pull from your git
repo so what's in your distribution package really matters not to us here.

I'm not saying this is the issue, but I do know that Acrobat offers
effective options for reducing the size impact of embedded images.

-Noel Carboni
 ProDigital Software

-----Original Message-----
From: mar...@li... <mar...@li...> 
Sent: Tue, June 2, 2020 12:51 PM
To: Bob Friesenhahn <bfr...@si...>
Cc: Lcms Liste <lcm...@li...>
Subject: Re: [Lcms-user] Lcms distribution package size


> Regardless out of the packages that GraphicsMagick directly uses, Lcms 
> has become the package with the largest source distribution file. 
> FreeType may be a good model to follow given that they distribute 
> three different archive files per release, one of which contains the 
> documentation.

Okey, after removing the documentation I have:

-rw-r--r-- 1 marti marti 5.0M Jun  2 16:55 lcms2-2.10_no_doc.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 marti marti  16M Jun  2 16:52 lcms2-2.10.tar.gz

Which seems reasonable. I have uploaded all packages on:

https://github.com/mm2/Little-CMS/releases/tag/lcms2.10
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lcms/files/lcms/2.10/

Thanks for pointing out the issue!
Best regards
Marti









_______________________________________________
Lcms-user mailing list
Lcm...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user