Re: [Lcms-user] What does cmsFLAGS_NOOPTIMIZE actually do?

[Boudewijn R. <bo...@va...>]

Thanks! I've done that just now. I'm also looking intensely forward to 
lcms 2.4 :-)

Thanks for all the wonderful work and explanations

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Marti Maria wrote:

> Hi,
>
>> Hm... I hadn't realized that, because it was just a 16 bitst rgb->rgb transform. In any case, maybe this is something to add to the documentation?
>
> Ok, I'm adding a paragraph in the tutorial about this.
>
>> And as a comment to tifficc, since tifficc adds the no-optimize flag by default, so I was wondering why and whether that was the right thing to do.
>
> It doesn't by default. You have to add -c0 to get the no-optimize behavior.
>
>> Is there are a good way to check whether a profile defines a linear rgb colorspace? I guess not...
>
> You are right. It is certainly possible a complex profile that behaves linear in most of its gamut but curved in dark shadows. The only way would be to examine all 65535x65535x65535 combinations.
>
>> Or should I just give the user an option?
> I think this is by far the easier way.
>
> Regards
> Marti
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Lcms-user mailing list
> Lcm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
>