Re: [Lame-dev] 3.93 problem

[Takehiro T. <tak...@in...>]

>>>>> "G" == Gabriel Bouvigne <bou...@mp...> writes:

    G> There only a small part that introduces the problem: using the
    G> same short block pre-echo prevention with cbr and vbr (a
    G> subbart of the part 2/4 of Takehiro's fix).  This might be an
    G> indication of another problem.

    G> I think that I should commit the fix, even if from a theorical
    G> point of view we would better find why is there a problem here.

No problem.

I've been feeling all the --alt-preset are based on clevery(or hackish ?)
and delicate balance of psymodel and noise shaping. Now I confirmed it
as true.

    G> Once commited, we could have a 3.93.1 or something like that.
    G> I am waiting for approval or disapproval before committing....

>>>>> "A" == Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> writes:

    A> I vote for 3.94.

I vote for 3.93.1, because there's already 3.94 alphas arround and it
makes people confusing.

    A> Should we wait a little bit (if yes: how long?) for other bugs
    A> or should we make the new release as soon as possible?

    G> I think that we should wait a little bit until next Friday or
    G> Saturday.

IMHO, it is not important how long we wait.... because there's no
people who want/willing to test and report the problem in the CVS
version.
-- 
Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you!