Re: [Lame-dev] adaptative ath

[Gabriel B. <bou...@mp...>]

> I don't have much to add, but maybe you can use that at the moment
>
> -V1 + "+ 6; //std --athlower -6" is considered transparent for the
> freqs <12khz.  Verified by Hans Heijden, which means something...
>
> Maybe a point to start.  Would be silly IMO to start
> with the same LF bitwaste which was there in <=3.87.

Yes, I'm aware of this experiment.
The first thing is that to my mind this should influence the ath shape as it
has nothing to do with the shape, only the level. So I don't think the ath
function is the right place to put the level adjustment.
The second thing is that this is something I'm taking into consideration. Of
course it would require more testing, but it might be an indication that the
base level of the curve is not optimal.


Regards,


--

Gabriel Bouvigne - France
bou...@mp...
mobile phone: gs...@mp...
icq: 12138873

MP3' Tech: www.mp3-tech.org
personal page: http://gabriel.mp3-tech.org