Re: [Lame-dev] Testers needed for current SVN version of LAME

[Thomas O. <tho...@or...>]

Am Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:28:18 +0100
schrieb John Edwards via Lame-dev <lam...@li...>: 

> It functions perfectly well except that the output wave file is 1152 
> samples shorter than it should be on my test file. The "skipping 
> initial" and "skipping final" messages are the same but "Frame# " shows 
> "9782/9782    32 kbps   MS" with libmpg123 and "9784/9784 32 kbps   MS" 
> with the standard mpglib compile.

Could it be that libmpg123 parses the Info frame, for example? I am
actually not sure right now which metadata processing the mpglib fork
does, as I was only occupied with replacing it;-) You should compare
with your initial uncompressed file for which output is more
appropriate. I'd expect just some added silence missing.


Alrighty then,

Thomas