From: Peter S. <pet...@po...> - 2005-07-30 20:16:21
|
The reason that it says so is because the same user has already just logged in. As I said, it seems like the rp-pppoe client doesen't understand that a connection is ok and reinitiates it. 29 jul 2005 kl. 18.52 skrev Vladislav Bjelic: > It seems that your RADIUS server sends IP address (you have setup for > "static IP address" or something) "2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 Radius > reply contains IP address > 83.140.228.177" but your l2tpns server already allocated this IP > address from pool to other session. Remove static IP config or use IP > address not in l2tpns pool... > > wlad > > On 7/29/05, Peter Salanki <pet...@po...> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We also experience problems with rp-pppoe clients: >> >> 005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 LCP: ConfigReq (14 bytes)... >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 Sending ConfigAck >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 LCP: ConfigAck (18 bytes)... >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 PAP login rix...@ri.../ucRZUd8q >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 Sending login for rix...@ri.../ >> ucRZUd8q to radius >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 LCP: ConfigReq (14 bytes)... >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 Sending ConfigAck >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 LCP: ConfigAck (18 bytes)... >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 Received RADIUSAUTH, radius 13246 response >> for session 13 (Access-Accept, id 206) >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 PAP User rix...@ri... >> authentication allowed. >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 Radius reply contains IP address >> 83.140.228.177 >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 Sending dns1 = 217.75.96.11 >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 Sending dns2 = 217.75.96.12 >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 Doing session setup for session >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/40 Kill session 40 (rix...@ri...): >> Duplicate session for users >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 00/13 Route add 83.140.228.177/255.255.255.255 >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 Sending initial IPCP to client >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 Login by rix...@ri... at >> 83.140.228.177 from 195.58.100.218 (telenor-ras) >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 PAP login rix...@ri.../ucRZUd8q >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 Already an IP allocated: 83.140.228.177 >> (-1) >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 Fallback response to PAP (ACK) >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 Shutting down session 13: PAP >> authentication failed. >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 04/13 Allocated radius 13247 >> 2005-07-29 14:46:49 00/13 Route del 83.140.228.177/255.255.255.255 >> >> >> It seems like they don'tt understand that they are connected or >> something. Anyone who has any experience with rp-pppoe + l2tpns? >> >> /Peter Salanki >> Port80 AB >> Stockholm, Sweden >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO >> September >> 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices >> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * >> Testing & QA >> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/ >> bsce5sf >> _______________________________________________ >> L2tpns-users mailing list >> L2t...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/l2tpns-users >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September > 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * > Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/ > bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > L2tpns-users mailing list > L2t...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/l2tpns-users > |