Re: [l2tpns-devel] L2TPNS radius resent question

[Daryl T. <Dar...@ha...>]

Muhammad Tayseer Alquoatli wrote:

> duplicated user name also will cause the same behavior no matter about
> the IP adresses

Aha!  Except when "allow duplicate users" is set, which is what
I have.  This is what threw me earlier (apart from my own
confusion, noted below).

> well, from L2TPNS point of view, in the case of duplicated IP/user
> l2tpns handles the old and the new sessions as two different sessions
> (they'll have two different indexes in session array) and hence it can
> send a STOP packet on the old session and a START packet on the new
> session.

Yes, I see that now.  I was thinking that the session index was
getting re-used, hence the need for a "fast shutdown", but it's
not, so doing a sessionshutdown() should be OK (I've just checked
that the routes are pulled down before being reinstated - if it
was the other way around it would be a bad thing :-).  So I'm
wrong, your proposed fix looks good!

> please CMIIW

Sorry, I'm not familiar with this acronym?

Cheers.


-- 
Regards,
  Daryl Tester