[L2tp-develop] (no subject)

[Simon H. <sd...@ab...>]

I found that just commenting out the line of the udp port compare on the lns
makes the problem go away.

Simon

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Hughes <sd...@ab...>
To: l2t...@li... <l2t...@li...>
Cc: Bill Baumann <bba...@sp...>
Date: Thursday, February 07, 2002 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: [L2tp-develop] lns only likes 1 peer udp port


>Hi Bill
>
>Regarding this point:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>There is a problem however.  Peer's UDP port is derived solely from the
>>>configuration file.  It should be fixed only when explicitedly specified
>>>to a non-zero value.  If zero (any port), the source port of the SCCRQ
>>>message should used.  This is an easy fix.
>>>
>>
>>Thanks for this. I'll try it today.
>>
>
>
>Sorry. I misunderstood your mail. I thought that if I set peer_udp = 0 in
>lacd.conf for the peer "lns" then this would sort the problem. When I tried
>this it didn't make any difference. There was a message in the lns
>/var/log/lacd.log to the effect:
>
>Error: Invalid value, must be between 1 and 65536
>Error: Occurred with the category 'peer' named venus.cam.xstreamis.co.uk
>Error: Last line read '  our_udp = 0'
>
>Simon
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>L2tp-develop mailing list
>L2t...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/l2tp-develop