From: Joseph W. <jo...@bi...> - 2001-08-18 13:57:20
|
Hi > This article really got me thinking. The > "This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > (at your option) any later version." > > line is quite dangerous. what if the FSF (or whoever owns the license) > decides to release a new version with a commercial clausule (so the fSF may > sell commercial licenses...) we can't do anything about it. > I don't know about other countries, but as far as I know these lines aren't effective at least in Germany and Austria. (In America they workd). In Germany/Austria "or (at your option) any later version." is not backed by law -> you will have to explicitly specify, if you want the user to be able to use GPL 3, ..... At least in Germany/Austria, there are some otther things not backed by the law. eg the paragraph talking about no liabilty in general. The author can be held liable in Germany/Austra, althought he puts this lines into the licencse. (eg if he knows about a severe problem, which eg can cause data loss, but doesn't inform the user that this possibility exists, or if he WANTS to damage something/someone/... with her/his software) I'm no lawyer though, just heard something about it at LinuxTag in Stuttgart. Joseph Wenninger |