Re: [Klibido-devel] kde4

[Bauno <ba...@in...>]

On Wednesday 2 January 2008 23:18:25 Thomas Anderson wrote:

> We were not necessarily thinking about a fork or anything. We just felt
> like we wanted to start off with something that was working. We didn't have
> any idea how much was left to do with the cvs code. I personally didn't
> want to try and pick up half way through a database interface rewrite. That
> was my opinion, but I am along for whatever ride. I don't have the
> experience to be the driving force.

On one hand, you're right, 0.2.5 is working (more or less) and it's a good 
starting point for a KDE4 port.
On the other hand, the code is a real mess and should be heavily reactored 
ASAP. So it could be possible it's not worth the effort to port it.
Ideally, the refactoring should take place before the port. But practically, 
since we don't know how much it will take, it's maybe worth to start the two 
jobs "in parallel". The KDE 4 team can then decide if and when port 
the "refactored" code into their branch.

Opinions needed :-]

-- 
Bauno - Meglio dell'ebola, ma di poco.