From: Maik B. <mai...@gm...> - 2007-10-07 08:07:27
|
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2007 23:23:49 schrieb Thomas Braun: > That's nice to hear. > How general is your Makefile? > > We got some more requests on Makefile generation, so I thought it > might be nice to have same good makefile as template. > > Thanks, > Thomas I don't use makefile templates. I wrote some CMake macros which describe dependencies and action (like running latex). CMake maps them to Makefile rules. The reason for doing it this way is epix(http://mathcs.holycross.edu/~ahwang/current/ePiX.html), which is a lib for drawing mathematically pictures using C++. The building of the executables which spit out eepic/tikz/pstricks code is integrated into the latex building process. If I change the c++-source of a picture the executable is build, executed and pdflatex runs. At the moment all tex-sources and pictures(png,eps) are copied to the build directory(out of source building). Now I playing with the --output-directory option to avoid copying and to make it able to use kile's editor features(at the moment I'm using texlipse for eclipse). It works fine with pdflatex, but the latex->dvips->p2pdf chain omits the picture. However, I don't think its what you have in mind for kile's makefile generation and I don't have any pointers to makefile templates. Regards, Maik Beckmann |