[Keepalived-announce] VRRP parsed invalid IP

[Igor C. <ig...@en...>]

Hi all,

I'm seeing the following error messages in the log from keepalived:


Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16981]:
VRRP_Instance(dnsmasq-dhcptap0) Entering MASTER STATE
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16981]:
VRRP_Instance(dnsmasq-dhcptap0) setting protocol VIPs.
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16981]:
VRRP_Instance(dnsmasq-dhcptap0) setting protocol Virtual Routes

*Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived[15918]: VRRP child process(16981) died:
RespawningMar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived[15918]: Starting VRRP child
process, pid=16991*
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Netlink reflector reports IP
10.20.1.185 added
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Netlink reflector reports IP
192.168.0.185 added
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Netlink reflector reports IP
10.10.1.185 added
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Netlink reflector reports IP
172.29.240.3 added
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Netlink reflector reports IP
fe80::497:e4ff:fea3:7bbe added
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Netlink reflector reports IP
fe80::e055:6aff:fe54:2363 added
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Netlink reflector reports IP
fe80::c004:26ff:febd:ae23 added
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Netlink reflector reports IP
fe80::fca9:59ff:fe0e:9ee0 added
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Netlink reflector reports IP
fe80::d49c:e3ff:fe4c:13d1 added
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Netlink reflector reports IP
fe80::d894:19ff:fe34:91fc added
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Netlink reflector reports IP
fe80::e8bd:5aff:fe9f:c122 added
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Netlink reflector reports IP
fe80::a850:8aff:fe9b:d779 added
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Registering Kernel netlink
reflector
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Registering Kernel netlink
command channel
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Registering gratuitous ARP
shared channel



*Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Opening file
'/etc/keepalived/keepalived.conf'.Mar 15 10:44:06 node01
Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: VRRP parsed invalid IP track_script. skipping
IP...Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: VRRP parsed invalid IP
{. skipping IP...Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: VRRP parsed
invalid IP dnsmasq-dhcptap0. skipping IP...*
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Initializing ipvs 2.6
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Configuration is using :
67654 Bytes
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: Using LinkWatch kernel
netlink reflector...
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: IPVS: Daemon has already run
Mar 15 10:44:06 node01 Keepalived_vrrp[16991]: VRRP sockpool: [ifindex(5),
proto(112), unicast(1), fd(10,11)]


Looks like keepalived crashes and respawns on of the processes which might
be related to the above highlighted lines ie possibly some config parsing
issue. The relevant part of my config is as follows:

vrrp_script dnsmasq-dhcptap0 {
    script "kill -0 $(< /var/run/dnsmasq/dnsmasq-dhcptap0.pid)"
    interval 2
}

vrrp_instance dnsmasq-dhcptap0 {
    state MASTER
    priority 102
    interface vmbr0
    virtual_router_id 47
    advert_int 3
    lvs_sync_daemon_interface eth2
    nopreempt

    unicast_src_ip 192.168.0.185
    unicast_peer {
        192.168.0.186
    }

    notify_master "/etc/keepalived/dnsmasq.sh start dhcptap0 node02"
    notify_backup "/etc/keepalived/dnsmasq.sh stop dhcptap0"

    virtual_ipaddress {
        172.29.240.3/24 dev dhcptap0 scope global
    }

    virtual_routes { 172.29.240.0/24 dev dhcptap0 }

    track_script {
        dnsmasq-dhcptap0
    }
}

The idea is to start dnsmasq process attached to dhcptap0 on IP takeover
for that interface on the MASTER. Now, the log messages are confusing to
me, why would it complain about invalid IP when parsing track_script
statement??

I'm really stamped and probably missing something obvious, any help with
this is appreciated.

Thanks,
Igor