My test program calls a function EtnModuleImpl::checkVersion several times. Inside this function, a call to EtnActiveFilter::readNewConfig is made exactly the first time when EtnModuleImpl::checkVersion is called.
I'm interested in the call graph in a situation where EtnActiveFilter::readNewConfig is not called. I know that I have a test function PfEtnIssueEntryAppl::doTestLevel0_1 where this is the case (I instrumented the code with cout-calls for that purpose).
Nevertheless, whenn looking at the call graph for PfEtnIssueEntryAppl::doTestLevel0_1, I see the call to EtnModuleImpl::checkVersion (which is correct), but inside that also the call to EtnActiveFilter::readNewConfig (which is definitely incorrect).
Is that a correct visualization of kcachegrind? Can I rely on the performance numbers that kcachegrind shows?
I attach the described callgraph.
Any help would be appreciated!
Log in to post a comment.