From: Samuele P. <ped...@bl...> - 2002-01-25 12:09:23
|
Hi. [Syver Enstad] > Thanks, I'll fix it. In my opinion could be much more compliant with > CPython without doing anything special. Bare opinions count so little <wink>. Btw some people do care about this so you will see some improvements and we have had some improvement (os.system ...). > As I don't know java, this is > maybe more important to me than to people who are used to the java > libraries and don't notice problems when using standard python modules > and modules they've written for CPython. It's is simpler than that. It's a matter of agendas. See - Core language compatibility - Support for shell-like programming * - Introspection/analysis tools compatibility - Support for the "internet protocols" CPython modules - Better Java/Java frameworks integration - Fixing bugs - Refactoring, avoiding that the codebase becomes a mess This is in no particular order, but confronted with such a least many mantainers have/will pick * as the item with the lowest priority. Jython is not primarily about that. regards, Samuele Pedroni. PS: Properly supporting shell-like programming across platforms over Java is more painful than it seems. |