Re: [Jython-users] Jython 3?

[John A. H. <ja...@gm...>]

Hi Stefan, 

Much appreciated for the feedback!

Cheers,

John

> On Jul 15, 2023, at 12:22 PM, Stefan Richthofer <ste...@gm...> wrote:
> 
> For the interested dev, Jython 3 is developed under the "main" branch: https://github.com/jython/jython/tree/main <https://github.com/jython/jython/tree/main>
> Also see https://www.jython.org/jython-3-roadmap <https://www.jython.org/jython-3-roadmap> and https://www.jython.org/jython-3-mvp <https://www.jython.org/jython-3-mvp>.
> Initially Python 3.8 was targeted since it was the Python version in development when the mvp discussion was formulated.
> The target version was, however, somewhat recently adjusted to Python 3.11.
> 
> Best,
> 
> -Stefan
> 
> Am Sa., 15. Juli 2023 um 17:09 Uhr schrieb Yaqiang Wang <yaq...@gm... <mailto:yaq...@gm...>>:
> Some of the features of Python 3 attract me in this document: https://www.asmeurer.com/python3-presentation/python3-presentation.pdf <https://www.asmeurer.com/python3-presentation/python3-presentation.pdf>, including features 2, 9, 11, 12.
> 
> Regards
> Yaqiang
> 
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 8:33 PM John A. Hayes <ja...@gm... <mailto:ja...@gm...>> wrote:
> I think the conclusion from all this mail-list activity is there is great interest in a Jython 3.X. Rather than just saying I’m another +1 (which is true), is there a short-list of things that need to be achieved to reach Python 3+ compatibility? 
> 
> In my naive experience as a Python user, the most substantive difference between Python 2+ and Python 3+ was the transition between “print” being a statement in 2 and a function in 3 and that seems trivial. All the other changes were under the hood and not important from a user’s perspective.
> 
> If there are more corner cases, I’m happy to help,
> 
> All the best, and I’m a super big fan of the project; it’s just a bit mysterious how any of us can help.
> 
> John
> 
>> On Jul 15, 2023, at 1:31 AM, Liam Coughlin <lsc...@gm... <mailto:lsc...@gm...>> wrote:
>> 
>> +2 for jython 3 - wait am I doing this right?
>> 
>> On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 2:13 AM Jon R. Fox <drj...@gm... <mailto:drj...@gm...>> wrote:
>> +1 for Jython 3.x
>> I'm using Groovy for now.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jython-users mailing list
>> Jyt...@li... <mailto:Jyt...@li...>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jython-users mailing list
>> Jyt...@li... <mailto:Jyt...@li...>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Jython-users mailing list
> Jyt...@li... <mailto:Jyt...@li...>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users>
> 
> 
> -- 
> *************************************************
> Dr. Yaqiang Wang
> Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences (CAMS)
> 46, Zhong-Guan-Cun South Avenue
> Beijing, 100081
> China
> 　　　　　　　　　　　　　
> yaq...@gm... <mailto:yaq...@gm...>
> 
> www.meteothink.org <http://www.meteothink.org/>
> **************************************************
> _______________________________________________
> Jython-users mailing list
> Jyt...@li... <mailto:Jyt...@li...>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users>
> _______________________________________________
> Jython-users mailing list
> Jyt...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users