Re: [Jython-users] Jython 3?

[John A. H. <ja...@gm...>]

I think the conclusion from all this mail-list activity is there is great interest in a Jython 3.X. Rather than just saying I’m another +1 (which is true), is there a short-list of things that need to be achieved to reach Python 3+ compatibility? 

In my naive experience as a Python user, the most substantive difference between Python 2+ and Python 3+ was the transition between “print” being a statement in 2 and a function in 3 and that seems trivial. All the other changes were under the hood and not important from a user’s perspective.

If there are more corner cases, I’m happy to help,

All the best, and I’m a super big fan of the project; it’s just a bit mysterious how any of us can help.

John

> On Jul 15, 2023, at 1:31 AM, Liam Coughlin <lsc...@gm...> wrote:
> 
> +2 for jython 3 - wait am I doing this right?
> 
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 2:13 AM Jon R. Fox <drj...@gm... <mailto:drj...@gm...>> wrote:
> +1 for Jython 3.x
> I'm using Groovy for now.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Jython-users mailing list
> Jyt...@li... <mailto:Jyt...@li...>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users>
> _______________________________________________
> Jython-users mailing list
> Jyt...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-users