Re: [Jython-dev] Migrating to GitHub

[Jeff A. <ja...@fa...>]

Thanks for testing in your environment. That's a good reassurance I 
haven't made a dud.

Presumably it now also signs on with a sensible sensible change set 
reference, instead of just grumbling about being an uncontrolled copy. 
(ISTR you used to see that when working git-based. We've caught up with 
you.)

I think we should say jython/jython is open for business. Anyone have 
misgivings?

Jeff

Jeff Allen

On 11/06/2020 07:34, Adam Burke wrote:
> Basic test drives and sanity tests worked for me:
>
> + cloned new repo on a new (windows) machine
> + built from ant
> + ran gradle but got a deprecation warning which seems to be the 
> current state
> + spun up the console, did a few simple things
> + ran system tests and got current expected state
>
> 7 tests skipped:
>     test_codecmaps_hk test_curses test_smtpnet test_socketserver
>     test_subprocess test_urllib2net test_urllibnet
> 0 tests failed:
>
> Platform:
> 'Java-13.0.2-OpenJDK_64-Bit_Server_VM,_13.0.2+8,_Oracle_Corporation-on-Windows_10-10.0-amd64'
> Command line:
> ['C:\\Users\\burkeat\\jython\\jython1\\jython\\dist\\Lib\\test\\regrtest.py', 
> '-e', '-m', 'regrtest_memo.txt']
>
> Cheers
> Adam
>
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 17:55, Jeff Allen <ja...@fa... 
> <mailto:ja...@fa...>> wrote:
>
>     Welcome to your new home: https://github.com/jython/jython
>
>     Take a look around. I'm sincerely hoping this works for us all, or
>     is only wrong in ways we can put right. If you find this is
>     irreparably messed up, we may be able to start over. Otherwise, I
>     think this is where we now invite contribution and fix issues.
>
>     After a day or two cooling off, I propse we ask the Ernest and the
>     infrastructure team to make hg.python.org/jython
>     <http://hg.python.org/jython> read-only in some gentle way we
>     could reverse if we had to.
>
>     Anything other loose ends?
>
>     Jeff
>
>     Jeff Allen
>
>     On 25/05/2020 16:42, Jeff Allen wrote:
>>     We've wanted to do this for ages. If you go back far enough, you
>>     can find Jim confidently asserting we'd use GitHub for 2.7.2
>>     (https://sourceforge.net/p/jython/mailman/jython-dev/thread/CAOhO%3DaO_4GruQXQqmZk39a0C%3DXUnKyj%3DG6OcQtBkhtoQm9BCjw%40mail.gmail.com/#msg35054683).
>>
>>     Building with Gradle and accessing dependencies remotely (no JARs
>>     checked in) were identified as prerequisites at the time. In
>>     turn, I think building with Gradle requires re-organising the
>>     code to fit with its /convention over configuration/ idea
>>     (https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/organizing_gradle_projects.html#sec:use_standard_conventions).
>>     At least, doing otherwise in 2.7.2 got too difficult for me,
>>     somewhere around exposed classes ISTR.
>>
>>     These don't seem to be prerequisites for the move. I would do
>>     Jython 3 that way, but leave 2.7.3 as it is.
>>
>>     https://bugs.jython.org/issue2892 opened to cover this. I'll try,
>>     starting withthe obvious way
>>     (https://help.github.com/en/github/importing-your-projects-to-github/importing-a-repository-with-github-importer)
>>     and reading what CPython did. I'd be happy to take input from
>>     anyone with a sure-fire answer.
>>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Jython-dev mailing list
>     Jyt...@li...
>     <mailto:Jyt...@li...>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev
>