From: Jeff A. <ja...@fa...> - 2020-02-06 09:36:31
|
On 13/01/2020 14:55, Jeff Mitchell wrote: > > On 06/01/2020 15:49, Jeff Mitchell wrote: > > I have found jython for 2.x to be exceedingly stable (thanks! > > wonderful piece of work over the years!) .. though you need to > halfway > > recent for ssl/encryption changes and stability fixes. > > I'm glad you've found it so. Although familiar mostly with its flaws, > now and then I stand far enough back to recognise how remarkable an > achievement it is, and that I have the privilege of contributing to. > > > Any big flaws we should know about? or you mean just internal design > flaws, which are inevitable for such a project? :) > Mostly unfixed bugs, test skips and implementation gaps. They're not hidden. A number of XXX and FIXME comments are scattered around the code base and we have a bug-tracker. Also, I wish there were better explanations of some of the cleverness. My point, however, is that when working mostly as a maintainer, and perfectionist, flaws loom large and one forgets that Jython is a significant intellectual feat that does a good job for many users in practice. > > Maybe update some 'signs of life' somewhere on the website or repo > might be wise, as I've seen a few people asking around this over the > months? *shrug* > > Thank you (and the team!) again! > You're welcome. The next beta will appear shortly in NEWS and if nothing really bad turns up, a release candidate in 2-3 weeks. A roadmap (for 2.7.x and 3.x) would not be worth much except as declaration of intent to go that way. Jeff Allen |