From: Jeff A. <ja...@fa...> - 2019-09-03 06:31:42
|
Good, I'm glad that seems sensible. I think there has to be a 2.7.3 as a target for bug-fixes etc.. For me 2.7.2 as a thing we have to get out to clear space for 3. Separate topic. Jeff Allen On 02/09/2019 23:00, Pekka Klärck wrote: > Jim Baker wrote:: >> +100 >> >> I like this well-considered compromise. Source compatibility with Java 7 ensures it is possible for a self service model if there are users who actually need Java 7. Meanwhile we are able to ensure all of our dependencies are supported, which is key for any release. > +1 > >> This approach also gives an immediate path forward to being on Java 11, the only current LTS option, for a Jython 2.7.3, as well as setting up for Jython 3.x development. > Has there been discussion lately about Jython 2.7.3 vs Jython 3? I'd > personally like to see all efforts concentrated on Jython 3 once > Jython 2.7.2 is out. Python 2 EOL being very near, more and more > projects are dropping Python 2 support and at the same time they drop > Jython support as well. For us Jython support is the primary reason to > support Python 2 still after the EOL, but I cannot see us doing it > past 2020 anymore. > > Cheers, > .peke |