Re: [Jython-dev] What's needed to get jython.org updated?

[Jim B. <jim...@py...>]

I suggest we switch to James' new site ASAP. It looks good to me, and I
really like how it puts the Java integration front and center. Yes, we can
improve upon it, but that's what a PR is for :)

On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 8:19 PM Adam Burke <ada...@gm...> wrote:

> Thanks for explaining Stefan. A quick look suggests the new site is
> shaping up well, too.
>
> Adam
>
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 20:36, Stefan Richthofer <
> ste...@gm...> wrote:
>
>> There is promising work by James Mudd on a github pages based replacement.
>> See http://bugs.jython.org/issue2658 and
>> https://jamesmudd.github.io/jython.github.io/
>> IMO getting this work into sufficient state is the best and fastest way
>> to tackle the
>> jython.org issue. I think that page is open for contributions :)
>>
>> -Stefan
>>
>> Am Fr., 5. Okt. 2018 um 12:17 Uhr schrieb Adam Burke <
>> ada...@gm...>:
>>
>>> The http://www.jython.org/ still has the best google juice, and has a
>>> 2.7.0 release, rather than the 2017 2.7.1 release on it.
>>>
>>> I know there was discussion to move to markdown documentation as part of
>>> a git repository, which sounds great too, and possibly easier for others to
>>> contribute to.
>>>
>>> Is an update to jython.org in the interim possible?
>>>
>>> Just noticed commentary like this, which is painful to read, as I know
>>> good work is going on:
>>>
>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52316449/running-python-using-java/52404266#52404266
>>>
>>> Sorry if this is raising a sore point, though.
>>>
>>> Adam
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Jython-dev mailing list
>>> Jyt...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Jython-dev mailing list
> Jyt...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev
>