From: Adam B. <ada...@gm...> - 2018-10-08 02:19:00
|
Thanks for explaining Stefan. A quick look suggests the new site is shaping up well, too. Adam On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 20:36, Stefan Richthofer <ste...@gm...> wrote: > There is promising work by James Mudd on a github pages based replacement. > See http://bugs.jython.org/issue2658 and > https://jamesmudd.github.io/jython.github.io/ > IMO getting this work into sufficient state is the best and fastest way to > tackle the > jython.org issue. I think that page is open for contributions :) > > -Stefan > > Am Fr., 5. Okt. 2018 um 12:17 Uhr schrieb Adam Burke < > ada...@gm...>: > >> The http://www.jython.org/ still has the best google juice, and has a >> 2.7.0 release, rather than the 2017 2.7.1 release on it. >> >> I know there was discussion to move to markdown documentation as part of >> a git repository, which sounds great too, and possibly easier for others to >> contribute to. >> >> Is an update to jython.org in the interim possible? >> >> Just noticed commentary like this, which is painful to read, as I know >> good work is going on: >> >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52316449/running-python-using-java/52404266#52404266 >> >> Sorry if this is raising a sore point, though. >> >> Adam >> _______________________________________________ >> Jython-dev mailing list >> Jyt...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev >> > |