From: Stefan R. <ste...@gm...> - 2018-10-05 10:36:55
|
There is promising work by James Mudd on a github pages based replacement. See http://bugs.jython.org/issue2658 and https://jamesmudd.github.io/jython.github.io/ IMO getting this work into sufficient state is the best and fastest way to tackle the jython.org issue. I think that page is open for contributions :) -Stefan Am Fr., 5. Okt. 2018 um 12:17 Uhr schrieb Adam Burke < ada...@gm...>: > The http://www.jython.org/ still has the best google juice, and has a > 2.7.0 release, rather than the 2017 2.7.1 release on it. > > I know there was discussion to move to markdown documentation as part of a > git repository, which sounds great too, and possibly easier for others to > contribute to. > > Is an update to jython.org in the interim possible? > > Just noticed commentary like this, which is painful to read, as I know > good work is going on: > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52316449/running-python-using-java/52404266#52404266 > > Sorry if this is raising a sore point, though. > > Adam > _______________________________________________ > Jython-dev mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev > |